Washington State Tries To Criminalize Service Providers For User Behavior; Internet Archive Sues

from the section-230,-have-you-read-it? dept

For years, we’ve talked about the importance of Section 230 in properly applying liability directed at the actual people who break laws, rather than the tools and services they use. Unfortunately, some people fail to make a distinction and love to blame service providers. And… once it gets into areas that make people react emotionally, things get ridiculous. For example, we’ve written a few times about the misguided attacks on Backpage.com, which only came about because of similar misguided attacks on Craigslist. At issue was that both sites had been used for prostitution and sex trafficking. But, rather than do the sensible thing and work with those platforms — who both have programs to do exactly this — to make it easier for law enforcement to find and prosecute those involved in such efforts, grandstanding politicians and activists blamed the service providers, driving the actual activities further underground. Of course, they have never had any real legal argument, and the lawsuits have fallen flat.

However, it appears that some politicians in Washington State decided to pass a state law (SB 6251) which targets service providers. It’s one of those laws that it’s easy for politicians to get behind without realizing what they’re actually doing. They think they’re “protecting the children” but they’re actually making the problem significantly worse. That’s because they’re not setting up a better way to track down and stop those actually responsible, but rather are simply telling them to move further underground, where it will be even harder to stop them.

And, of course, in their zeal to “protect the children” the politicians who passed this bill wrote it so broadly that it can create massive problems for tons of legitimate online service providers. The Internet Archive, represented by the EFF, has filed to join a lawsuit (from Backpage) against the law, pointing out that it clearly violates Section 230 of the CDA, which providers the necessary safe harbors for service providers. The overreach of the Washington law is pretty astounding:

SB 6251 would effectively coerce, by threat of felony prosecution, online service providers to become censors of third-party users’ content by threatening five years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine per violation against anyone who knowingly publishes, disseminates or displays or anyone who “indirectly” “causes” the publication, dissemination, or display of content that contains an explicit or even “implicit” offer of any sexual contact for “something of value” in Washington if the content includes an image that turns out to be of a minor. Because of its expansive language (i.e., “indirectly” “causes”), the law could be applied not only to online classified ad services like Backpage.com but also to any web site that provides access to third-party content, including user comments, reviews, chats, and discussion forums, and to social networking sites, search engines, Internet service providers, and more. A law that takes such an overbroad approach is of serious concern to the Internet Archive, which aims to serve as a library for the Internet, and accordingly, houses more than 150 billion web pages archived since 1996.

The law expressly states that it is not a defense that the defendant did not know that the image was of a minor. Instead, to avoid prosecution, the defendant must obtain governmental or educational identification for the person(s) depicted in the post (notably, even if that ID does not contain a photograph). This means that service providers – no matter where headquartered or operated – may be asked to review each and every piece of third-party content accessible through their services to determine whether the content is an “implicit” ad for a commercial sex act in Washington, whether it includes a depiction of a person, and, if so, obtain and maintain a record of the person’s ID. These obligations would severely impede the practice of hosting third-party content online.

I’m sure the folks behind this law had the best of intentions. Sex trafficking of underage persons is a very real and horrific problem (even if the numbers bandied about are massively exaggerated). But the real solution is to go after the actual perpetrators, and that means working with service providers to help track them down — not criminalizing the service providers in a way that kills off lots of legitimate activity as well.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: backpage.com, craigslist, eff, internet archive, village voice

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Washington State Tries To Criminalize Service Providers For User Behavior; Internet Archive Sues”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
20 Comments
Anonymou Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

“punish law makers who try to pass stupid laws like this.”

And therein lies the rub. How does this happen? Relying on the election process that is corrupted with money and courts claiming corporations are people has not, and will not work.

There needs to be something more on the order of a vote of no confidence that then leads to removal from office. I am not sure of the best mechanisms for this, but the incompetents and their laws need to go.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

I dunno, if you can get the people of their district, community, whatever to actually understand how freaking bad this law is and the fact it will harm more children than it will help you have completed step 1.
Step 2 is getting all of them to promise to call the lawmaker.
Step 3 is reminding them they can FB that lawmaker.
When a large group of the people who put you in the job point out this is flawed, and we’ll vote against you or try to recall you or point out you supported a law that HELPED molesters get access to children they tend to notice.

Anonymous Coward says:

‘working with service providers to help track them down — not criminalizing the service providers in a way that kills off lots of legitimate activity as well’

which, in turn, will actually hamper the discovery of those behind the acts instead of aiding finding them. like so many things lavished with ‘good intentions’, they aren’t thought through properly or the consequences are ignored with perhaps the opinion that any wrong can be righted later (always too late to do, so basically never happens/cant be done!) usual case of politicians trying to do something with a technology they dont understand

Dreddsnik says:

” I’m sure the folks behind this law had the best of intentions. “

I am equally sure that the intent behind this law has NOTHING to do with porn or human trafficking. If the SOPAs’,
ACTAs’ or other bad laws that are openly modeled to turn the internet into nothing but an online mall fail to pass there has to be a plan B. This is plan B.

The folks behind this law know precisely what they are doing.

Anonymous Coward says:

I’m sure the folks behind this law had the best of intentions,

Bullshit.

They just want to blame somebody else and sweep the problem under the rug. And that is what they are doing.

Folklore has is that there once might have been honorable politicians, but that was hundreds of years ago. There is NO such thing as a principled politician in America these days and that includes those that have held, hold and will hold the “highest office in the land”.

One need look no farther than the liar-in-chief – the miserable so and so is trying to blame Europe’s economic problems for the terrible US economy while the real cause (Wall Street’s innumerable crimes) go uninvestigated, unprosecuted and unpunished and he even runs defense for his Wall Street owners.

The American political system is utterly corrupt at all levels and the liars, thieves and criminals are “in charge” at all levels. Today’s American politicians are loathsome, gutless, self-aggrandizing, self-enriching, finger-pointing, useless sumbags.

btr1701 (profile) says:

Jurisdiction

> no matter where headquartered or operated

Why is it that our various legislative bodies constantly perpetuate this idea that they have jurisdiction over the entire world?

Unless I’m in Washington, or my business has substantial physical ties in the state (beyond a web site merely being on the internet), then I don’t give a rat’s ass what laws Washington State passes. They don’t have jurisdiction over me.

Chicken Sock Puppet says:

Now look who is all riled up...

Uh-oh, looks like they are going after Internet and content providers for the actions of a few. The result is that is punishes everyone else who DIDN’T break the law. This apparently has pissed off a few people who find this law unjust because it harms them for an offense they didn’t create.

You just keep that thought in mind the next time some progressive starts talking about banning guns because ONE moron uses them illegally.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...