Obama Administration Told It Should Return The Crystal-Covered Michael Jackson Glove It Illegally Seized

from the seriously? dept

We’ve talked repeatedly about the federal governments’ overly-aggressive nature in seizing and forfeiting things like domain names, but the government’s abuse of forfeiture and seizure laws goes way beyond just seizing digital assets. Basically, law enforcement often sees seizure and forfeiture laws as an excuse to steal from the public with little to no recrimination.

Thankfully, it looks like the courts may be starting to push back a bit. The Obama administration appears to be losing its case in which it seized millions of dollars worth of assets from the son of the president/dictator of Equatorial Guinea. Included in the haul is an original Michael Jackson crystal covered “glove” from the Bad tour. The feds are claiming that these were ill-gotten gains from corruption. That may be true, but the guy, Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue, hasn’t been convicted of any crimes either at home or in the US, so the courts are wondering why it should let the US just take his stuff. The feds have a chance to amend their argument, but it’s good to see that the judge is quite skeptical that such seizures are legal.

This kind of thing seems all too common with such in cases, where law enforcement goes after the stuff, but never goes after the actual people involved. And, of course, sometimes they make big mistakes. Either way, hopefully cases like this lead to fixing (or getting rid) of the ridiculous process of asset seizures without due process or without any charges being filed. It’s not just that it’s open to abuse, but that it is, clearly, regularly abused to either enrich law enforcement or just to hassle people the government doesn’t like. That shouldn’t be allowed.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Obama Administration Told It Should Return The Crystal-Covered Michael Jackson Glove It Illegally Seized”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
21 Comments
That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Don't rock the boat!

First they started stealing from criminals, and I didn’t speak out because they obviously deserved it.

Then they started stealing from people that they merely claimed were criminals, and I didn’t speak out because the government and law enforcement would never make a mistake about guilt.

Then they started stealing from me, and yet no one would listen when I proclaimed my innocence.

Ima Fish (profile) says:

I used to work at a record store/headshop (we sold pipes and bongs) back in the late 80s and early 90s. The police shut us down and took everything under forfeiture laws.

Forfeiture actions are not actions against individuals. They’re civil actions against property. Property has no rights.

It sort of makes sense if the property is heroin. Heroin is illegal, so if the government finds it, it can take it.

However, it turns grey very quickly when the government determines, “Well, this house might have been paid for by the sales of heroin. So let’s take the house too.”

All the “claimant” can do is file a claim in the civil proceeding against the property and hope he can get some of it back.

:Lobo Santo (profile) says:

Re: !

“Property has no rights” That’s right up there with “I wasn’t shooting at the enemy soldier, I was firing at his weapon and uniform. Sadly the enemy soldier was unintentionally injured/killed in the process”.

Utter cocknbull nonsense. Of course property doesn’t have rights, but the owner of said property allegedly has rights! *Grrr*

_sigh_

Gwiz (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I have a problem with tagging this as “Obama Administration” – you are making it sound like Obama himself said “wow, I really want a Michael Jackson glove… seize it!”.

It’s a common error made by most people trying to defame the President. WTG Mike, your Tea bagger buddies will be proud!

Hmmm. Let check out what Wikipedia has to say about the DOJ:

The United States Department of Justice (often referred to as the Justice Department or DOJ), is the United States federal executive department responsible for the enforcement of the law and administration of justice, equivalent to the justice or interior ministries of other countries.

The Department is led by the Attorney General, who is nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate and is a member of the Cabinet. The current Attorney General is Eric Holder.

Let’s recap: Part of the Executive Branch, AG nominated by President and member of President’s Cabinet.

Looks to me like the buck stops with the President, so using the phrase “Obama Administration” would be correct.

Chargone (profile) says:

When did it happen?

who knows? it’s a state of affairs that seems to come about eventually in any nation which does not either undergo a revolution which actually changes the system in search of a better way of doing things or find itself embroiled in a war of survival where the enemy’s ideology promotes such things, thus making opposing them imperative to the nation’s continued ability to fight. either of these things seem to reset the count.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...