ESA Officially Supports SOPA, VGVN Members Left In The Cold

from the oil-and-water dept

With all the attention video game companies and the ESA are getting over their quiet SOPA support, it seems it is no longer feasible to stay quiet. Over the last few days, a number of outlets have been calling on the ESA to come out in the open in its support for SOPA. It had been listed as a supporter of the bill but had never made an official comment in that regard until now. In a statement to various press outlets, the ESA has said the following:

As an industry of innovators and creators, we understand the importance of both technological innovation and content protection, and do not believe the two are mutually exclusive. Rogue websites – those singularly devoted to profiting from their blatant illegal piracy – restrict demand for legitimate video game products and services, thereby costing jobs. Our industry needs effective remedies to address this specific problem, and we support the House and Senate proposals to achieve this objective. We are mindful of concerns raised about a negative impact on innovation. We look forward to working with the House and Senate, and all interested parties, to find the right balance and define useful remedies to combat willful wrongdoers that do not impede lawful product and business model innovation.

This statement does little but echo the talking points of other supporters of SOPA. So any complaints of job loss or lost revenue have been addressed. However, this new found vocal support has raised a new question within the gaming world: what about the grassroots organization the ESA set up for gamers? During the height of the video game violence debate, the ESA created the Videogame Voters Network (VGVN) as a way for those that buy and play games to add their voice in opposition to legislation regulating violent games. With that debate settled by the Supreme Court, what does the ESA’s support for SOPA mean for members of the VGVN? This question was specifically raised by Jim Sterling of Destructoid.

Last year, when free speech in the videogame industry was threatened, you asked for help from gamers. The famous Brown vs. EMA/ESA case provided a landmark ruling that protected videogame content under the First Amendment. You appealed to gamers for their support and coverage, and many gamers rallied around the industry.

Now, when free speech at large is threatened, you not only refuse to fight the threat, you actually join forces with it. You operate a group that claims to protect free speech — the Videogame Voters Network — and pretend to champion the rights of gamers, but until you stop supporting the Stop Online Piracy Bill, that’s all the VGVN is — a pretense.

This confusion over the general fate of the VGVN and its implied support for SOPA is not limited to the media either. People visiting its Facebook page have been asking for clarification on the matter. Many have already made the connection that the interests of gamers are only important when those interests mirror those of the games industry. If ever the two should be opposed it would seem that the games industry wins as far as the ESA is concerned. As Jim put it:

It is hypocrisy on a most despicable level to continue supporting SOPA after asking gamers to fight for the rights of the game industry. You are sending the message that you want exclusive freedom for your stable of publishers, while the freedom of others means nothing. You are sending the message that the ESA is an organization that begs for help from a community, only to abandon and betray that community at the earliest convenience. You are the Starscream of trade associations.

While it is pretty easy to draw the conclusion that ESA member companies support SOPA via their membership in the ESA, it is quite another story for the VGVN. People who signed up for the VGVN did so under the idea that their support would go toward protecting the rights of gamers. However, this move by the ESA has shown that idea to be little more than a pretense, as Jim puts it. Why would anyone trust the VGVN in the future, if it actually has one at this point, if it will simply ignore the concerns of its members?

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: esa, vgvn

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “ESA Officially Supports SOPA, VGVN Members Left In The Cold”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Gamer #184,251 says:

Re: List of ESA members

Nvidia would do well to remove themselves from the ESA. A lot of people are already having driver/card problems and considering jumping ship to ATI, whom doesn’t appear to be on the list. This news pretty much guarantees that future video card purchases will NOT be Nvidia. I was planning on buying two of whatever their next iteration was going to be, but that’s not going to happen now, not after this news.

ltlw0lf (profile) says:

Re: Re: List of ESA members

A lot of people are already having driver/card problems and considering jumping ship to ATI

ATI is a wholly owned subsidiary of AMD. However, AMD is also not on the list.

I hate NVIDIA because of the Blobs and because, when put up against ATI cards of the same price-point, they are slower and fail a lot more. I’ve had about a dozen and a half NVIDIA cards fail, while only had one ATI card fail during the same period of time, under normal usage conditions. (The ATI card failed on a hot day while playing Portal 2…never would have tried to use an NVIDIA card in that case because I would have gone through three or four of them.)

Leonidas says:

When he said “find the right balance and define useful remedies to combat willful wrongdoers that do not impede lawful product and business model innovation” I’m sure he wasn’t thinking about the RIAA’s change in business model when they started suing everyone.

I’m honestly half wondering when their site (and others like it, RIAA, MPAA, etc.) will be considered a “rouge site” by it’s own members in the eyes of the scourge of SOPA/PIPA…

Jeffhole (profile) says:


So far the only good thing to come from SOPA is that I know which companies definitely shouldn’t get my money, now.

Before SOPA it could be a little tricky and research-intensive to find out which companies are “bad” and which ones are “good.” Now, armed with a list of SOPA supporters, it’s easy as shit to tell who’s bad.

Thanks, SOPA supporters!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Sweet!

Actually, I think another good thing to come of SOPA is the general awakening of We the People. I know lots of folks who don’t typically follow politics or the like who are suddenly writing to congressmen and engaging in online conversations. We’ll see if it survives the winter, or the death/passing of SOPA, but it’s been pretty impressive from my perspective.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...