What Other Websites Is The US Government Secretly Censoring?

from the questions-to-be-answered dept

We’re still trying to understand the overall fallout from last week’s news that the feds seized and censored the music blog Dajaz1.com for over a year and blocked every chance for the site to get its day in court… before finally giving up and just handing back the site. And while lots of people have focused on that story, it seems worth asking what about the others? Back in June, we released a list of five domains whose owners had asked the government to return them. Two of them, rojadirecta.org and rojadirecta.com, have been involved in a lawsuit. The government sought to forfeit those two domains (i.e., get to keep them permanently) — but did so only after rojadirecta’s company, Puerto 80, filed a lawsuit officially demanding the return of the domains.

As far as we know, the other three sites all followed a slightly different process, which involved them officially petitioning the government to return the domains — at which point the government has 90 days to either begin forfeiture procedures or to hand back the domain. That was in early June. As we know, with Dajaz1, the government had already begun getting a series of totally secret (indeed, we have no idea if they really exist) “extensions” from the court to allow them to hang onto the domain much longer without actually facing them in court over a forfeiture process. With Dajaz1, the government finally gave up and gave the domain back.

But there are still two domains unaccounted for: OnSmash.com and Torrent-Finder.com. Again, the list we posted back in June was an official list from DHS/ICE noting sites who had asked for the return of their domain. Even if we assume that such requests were made on June 13th (and they were all made significantly earlier), those domains either should have been returned or forfeiture proceedings started by mid-September at the latest. But we’re in December, and as far as we can tell, no such procedures are under way.

That leaves two options: OnSmash and Torrent-Finder rescinded their demands for the return of their domains… or they’re currently in the midst of the same Kafka-esque government-run secret censorship program. And, for all we know, there may be other sites as well.

So it seems like Attorney General Eric Holder and the Justice Department (as well as the folks at ICE) have some explaining to do. Who else are they censoring without due process? How many other sites had speech seized and are being denied their day in court? Just how deep does this program of the federal government censoring online websites go?

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,
Companies: dajaz1, onsmash, torrent finder

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “What Other Websites Is The US Government Secretly Censoring?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
TtfnJohn (profile) says:

Re: The Trial

I’d add a warning that those who have stomachs that are easily churned take the story into the reading room (aka bathroom) before reading. That way it won’t be too far to go when the last two days meals come up.

That said, it ought to be required reading. Not that it would make one iota of difference to Congress or the bureaucrats. Of course the U.S. Constitution should be too but it seems none of them have read that either or the Declaration of Independence.

Anonymous Coward says:

It’s not really censoring, it’s just ‘borrowing’ without asking for an indefinite period of time.

What about the messages saying the sites were seized you ask? Well that was what the government ‘borrowed’ the sites for, so ICE could look like it was doing something! That’s why ICE couldn’t just tell the owners that they were merely ‘borrowing’ their sites either!

Why haven’t the owners been compensated for their ‘borrowed’ sites? Well would you charge a friend if he wanted to borrow say one of your shirts for an evening? Of course not!

So why should be concerned about the government ‘borrowing’ hundred of websites without asking for a seemingly indefinite period of time? Only greedy people don’t let their friends ‘borrow’ stuff indefinitely without asking! Or do you not consider the US government a friend!

TechnoMage (profile) says:

The worst part about Censorship is...


Here is the full list of the sites that are filtered.

1) ~~~~~~~~~~~~
2) ~~~~~~~~~~~~
3) ~~~~~~~~~~~~
4) ~~~~~~~~~~~~
5) ~~~~~~~~~~~~
6) ~~~~~~~~~~~~
7) ~~~~~~~~~~~~
8) ~~~~~~~~~~~~

[UPDATE:] Thankfully, the Government Censors have already redacted this post, else this site would be in violation of the future SOPA2 law, which de-grandfather clauses the internet.

BeachBumCowboy (profile) says:

Other Websites

I have personal knowledge of ALL the other websites the government has seized. They are…


The previous poster’s comments have been redacted by ICE. For further questions please send correspondence to:

US Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
c/o MPAA and RIAA
Disney World Headquarters
1494 E Buena Vista Dr.
Lake Buena Vista, FL 32830

Rekrul says:

So it seems like Attorney General Eric Holder and the Justice Department (as well as the folks at ICE) have some explaining to do.

Who will they be doing this explaining to? Clearly the majority of the US government doesn’t care. The courts don’t care or they wouldn’t have signed the papers in the first place. Sure, a lot of the people care, but that doesn’t count for squat in today’s world.

The various agencies of the US government consider themselves untouchable by the law. Sadly, it looks like they’re right…

Robert Shaver (profile) says:

How to make a new link from an IP address

If a web site looses its domain name, it can create another one like this one I created at tinyURL(dot)com. It will only work for web sites that are not sharing an IP address with other web sites … which is quite common … virtual hosting.


But I can conceive of a similar service which would let the URL creator add the needed data which it would fill in when someone clicked on the shortened link.

Though I suppose ICE might seize tinyurl too since the law doesn’t seem to apply to them.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...