Arthur Alan Wolk Settles Lawsuits With Various Sites

from the and-so-it-goes dept

You may recall that famed aviation lawyer Arthur Alan Wolk had sued a bunch of parties, suggesting that their discussions about an earlier defamation lawsuit against him were against the law. Specifically, Wolk had filed a defamation lawsuit against, which was later deemed by the court to have been filed past the statute of limitations. Wolk later claimed this judgment was in error because Overlawyered had changed its blogging software, which he believed reset the clock. After we wrote about all of this and after a court reiterated that the change in blogging software did not change its original ruling, Wolk also promised to sue us if we did not “correct” our post. Instead, we posted a direct reply to Wolk (at that link)… and never heard from him again.

It appears that Wolk and at least some of those he’s sued have now come to various settlements. The Reason Foundation has announced that it has settled the lawsuit Wolk filed against it:

On August 1, Wolk dropped his Pennsylvania complaint, and on the same day he filed a similar one in California, where the Reason Foundation, the nonprofit organization that publishes Reason magazine and this website, is based. On August 12 he dropped the California complaint as well, and he recently agreed to a resolution consisting of mutual releases in which he promises not to sue us again for our past posts and we promise not to sue him over his litigation so far. That’s about as good an outcome as we could have reasonably expected, since the main issue for us all along has been maintaining the freedom to report and comment on issues of public concern. We are glad the litigation is over and grateful to Gayle Sproul for her patient, able, and indefatigable assistance in achieving that end. has also settled with Wolk, and placed the following statement on its site — though not in a blog post:

Arthur Alan Wolk, Esquire, Walter K. Olson, David M. Nieporent, Esquire and agreed to settle Wolk’s longstanding libel claims against, et al.

The parties agreed to dismiss with prejudice all litigation pending between them and also agreed to release each other from all claims. removed from its web site certain posts about Wolk that led to the case as well as other posts that commented on the case’s dismissal by the Court last August. Wolk removed from his web site a post he wrote about

Upon submission of materials to in the litigation, Overlawyered learned that Wolk took protections for his clients in the Taylor v. Teledyne case.

With the release of this statement, and Wolk will have nothing further to say on these matters and ask all others on the internet to take down their posts concerning this dispute since the controversy now has been settled on an amicable basis and should be laid to rest.

The Reason post, on the other hand, notes that just because the case has been settled, it “does not mean it never happened, so we are keeping our original posts and adding a link to the joint statement by and Wolk.” Similarly, we don’t believe that there is any benefit to taking down factual posts on historical events, even if they ended in an out-of-court settlement. In fact, we’re a bit disappointed that Overlawyered would agree to take down historical posts without a court-ordered reason to do so. Meanwhile, the Reason blog notes that because it does “not want to see any further lawsuits filed as a result of comments on our site,” it was disabling comments on that post.

We will neither remove historical posts nor disable comments. As we noted in our last post on Mr. Wolk’s email to us, we believe his intent in these lawsuits and threats was to silence people from talking about him — and we do not intend to be silenced by such threats when they do not appear credible to us.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Arthur Alan Wolk Settles Lawsuits With Various Sites”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Matthew A. Sawtell (profile) says:

Re: As for getting served... better than getting killed

As for the those that piss and moan about ‘lawyers’, consider this alternative:

With that in mind, rather see Mr. Wolk burn money than attempt to commit murder.

Stuart says:

Re: Re: As for getting served... better than getting killed


The fact that the majority of lawyers are greedy shit stains that harm innovation, prosperity, and freedom can only be fixed by turning into Mexico?

Cause there are no lawyers in Mexico. Right?

With that wonderful argument in mind allow me to state.

Anyone allowing you to argue on their behalf is an idiot.

Matthew A. Sawtell (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: As for getting served... better than getting killed

Wow… talk about taking the ball and running in the wrong direction.

The situation in Mexico far, far worse than in the U.S. – there is barely any rule of law for ANYONE work (or apparently breathe) in.

So are YOU saying you rather get into a firefight that deal with an issue in a court of law.

“The Law can be an Ass” as Dickens remarked, but the alternatives is merely Mob Tactics.

Paul Alan Levy (profile) says:

A slightly different take

I am not at all disappointed that Overlawyered agreed to take down his original post about Wolk. From my reading of the record, Wolk had a valid complaint about the gist of the post, even if his failure to file suit in time damned his litigation, even if Overlawyered had other valid defenses.
I discuss the case here:

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...