Did Universal Music Declare 50 Cent's Own Website Is A Pirate Site?

from the fact-checking dept

You may have heard last week that hip hop star 50 Cent got into a public war of words with his record label, Interscope (a division of Universal Music Group), concerning his upcoming album. 50 Cent claimed that differences would mean that the album was delayed. At the end of the week, it sounded like he had patched things up a bit and worked out the major differences, but he might want to take another look at what his label is doing.

As you may know, yesterday, we wrote about Universal Music’s involvement in putting together a list of “pirate” websites that ad giant GroupM would place on a big blacklist of sites. GroupM would use the blacklist to bar its ads from appearing on any listed site. We noticed many oddities on the list, including a bunch of websites that are considered the top of the top in the hip hop world when it comes to promoting new works. However, some in our comments noted an even odder site on the list: 50 Cent’s own website: ThisIs50.com.

Now, there may be some confusion, because it appears that there are two different “official” 50 sites. However, one of them, 50Cent.com is owned and run by Universal Music. ThisIs50.com is 50’s own site and is the one linked from his own Facebook page (which, in turn, is linked from his verified Twitter account). There seems to be little doubt that ThisIs50 is 50’s own website. In fact, if you look at the Universal-run 50Cent.com, it very prominently links to ThisIs50:

Furthermore, Universal Music and Interscope regularly linked to ThisIs50.com. Seems pretty odd to then put it on their list of “pirate” sites. Of course, in a bit of odd recursiveness, ThisIs50 now has a discussion going about the fact that it’s on the list. Perhaps this is some sort of “punishment” for 50 Cent’s earlier claims that “piracy” is just “marketing” and that he’ll make up the money elsewhere?

But, honestly, since supporters of PROTECT IP and other such legislation keep claiming that it’s so easy to figure out what is and what is not a “rogue site,” can someone explain how Universal recording artist 50 Cent’s own site gets on the list, which was apparently put together in part by Universal Music? I have a question in to folks at Universal Music, but once again, I doubt I’ll hear back.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: groupm, interscope, universal music, wpp

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Did Universal Music Declare 50 Cent's Own Website Is A Pirate Site?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
37 Comments
Matthew (profile) says:

What's that?

What’s that? It sounded like you said that the whole piracy kerfuffle is just a lot of posturing and playing politics whose eventual goal is to secure wealth and power for a bunch of glorified salesmen riding on the backs of artists and techies. It sounded like you said that this was just another datum of evidence that they really don’t care at all about artists and will do whatever it takes to maintain control and that we shouldn’t be surprised that they would turn on an artist who don’t toe the line since they turned on their customers years ago.

That’s what it sounded like anyway. Maybe i misheard.

Anonymous Coward says:

It’s always been amazing to me, that the entertainment industries…especially the music side, would expect everyone to know what is “their property”.

They’ve spent years and years hiding some of this info. You don’t see the real accounting books (when you buy this expensive info), you don’t see all the efforts to hide association with the majors when Indies became a hit and they tried to make themselves look Indie for sales, you don’t know that a lot of the big sellers are awarded their own personal label to distribute music from as a reward (and it looks like someone else putting out the music instead of the majors). You also don’t know when an artist becomes outside the major labels after a fall out and the repurchase of their contract.

Nor are the majors particularly wanting to part with the info unless in a law suit.

Even the anti-RIAA site like riaaradar has problems telling between albums by the same artists, which are property to the majors and which are not. (and they do get them wrong)

So after all this, magically you should just ‘know’. Actually that becomes a sales point to try and sell you a worthless filter that is extremely overpriced.

We’ve had time and again where it has been shown that the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing as it isn’t co-ordinated at all. Both sides seem to bumble around and claim you should just know while they prove they haven’t a clue either as to which is which.

Shane C (profile) says:

One of two things

My prediction is that one of two things is about to happen. One, Universal is about to roll out an “authenticate your website” program where for a price you can have the privileged of running their advertisements.

Or, they are about to say “Oops! We thought that list was the ‘approved list’ not the ‘disapproved list’,” and they’ll promptly revert the list for the time being (ie: until the bad press dies down).

DogBreath says:

Re: One of two things

I’m hoping it was the old “cutting off the nose to spite their face”.

The music industry seems to be pretty good at achieving many pyrrhic victories with great success these days. Perhaps it’s time for them to patent that business model before someone else does, and sue themselves back to wealth.

Rikuo (profile) says:

Re: One of two things

For a price, you can have the privilege of running their advertisements?

Wait…what? I thought advertisements paid the site, not the other way around! Although I actually wouldn’t be surprised if Universal completely forgot the most basic fact of marketing: you pay to get knowledge of your product out, others don’t pay you.

umb231 (profile) says:

… so, if Universal wants to make linking to pirate sites illegal… and it lists thisis50.com as a pirate site… and then links to the site via their own site… shouldn’t they order ICE to take down Universal’s site (for a few months at the least with no warning or way to officially object)?
Wait, what was I thinking, the rules don’t apply to Universal cause they’re the ones making them.

Ma Official (profile) says:

This is BULLSQUABLE

Aside from the political comments, this is BS. Music needs to be heard, one way or another it will. Artists make most of their music money from doing shows, PERIOD. (Pun intended)

You have a handful of artists who actually get endorsements and other contracts that help supplement their show money.

If people don’t get the music and become fans, then artists are left to be heard on radio (Corporate BS too), on TV (O.o) and on iTunes. Who is going to buy a song they have never heard?

SomeGuy (profile) says:

As you may know, yesterday, we wrote about Universal Music‘s involvement in putting together a list of “pirate” websites that ad giant GroupM would place on a big blacklist of sites. GroupM would use the blacklist to bar its ads from appearing on any listed site.

We noticed many oddities on the list, including a bunch of websites that are considered the top of the top in the hip hop world when it comes to promoting new works.

Now, there may be some confusion, because it appears that there are two different “official” 50 sites. However, one of them, 50Cent.com is owned and run by Universal Music.

Am I the only one who thinks this is obviously an attempt to stifle Warner’s competition? One of the main things a label does is promotion, and now a label is essentially attacking competing promoters?

Anonymous Coward says:

Even if thisis50.com is his personal site, he is under contract to the record label and may not have rights to put material up on his site because he signed those rights away for money.

I think many people here don’t realize that these artists would likely sell their own dog for cash, and in signing those contracts, they give up many of their rights in return for a big payout.

Chris Hoeschen (profile) says:

ThisIs50 now has a discussion going about the fact that it’s on the list. Perhaps this is some sort of “punishment” for 50 Cent’s earlier claims that “piracy” is just “marketing” and that he’ll make up the money elsewhere?

And if they get the PROTECT-IP act signed in they will only block sites that have infringing content and not just sites they get into an argument with.

Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Except for the fact the government really isn’t cash strapped. The last thing the government wants is people looking too closely at accounting books, especially since if people really examined the entertainment industries real books and saw how much money really gets kicked to the politicians they might actually be forced to open up their own books.

Lakisha stone says:

Hello mr . Jackson this is Lakisha I would like to please speak to you could you call me 440 7143788

THIS COULD BE PRIVATE so what they hatin I don’t care n you don’t either I’m used to the bull I want our friendship back to stay in touch been kickin my tail n going krazy. I’m still recovering my surgeries and may have one to go could u call me please

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...