How Much Does It Cost Taxpayers To Implement Three Strikes?

from the this-seems-important dept

With the recent UN report condemning three strikes laws that kick people off the internet based on accusations (not convictions) of copyright infringement as a civil rights violation, there’s been a lot more attention paid to the reasonableness of such laws. Of course, there are other factors to take into account as well, including the general cost to the taxpayer. Over in the UK, James Firth filed some Freedom of Information requests with the UK government to try to understand how much such things are really costing. He got an answer from Ofcom, the telecom/ISP regulator, who noted that it’s expected to have spent about £5.9 million (or just under $10 million) by the end of this year on implementing the digital copyright enforcement measures in the Digital Economy Act (which are mostly about a three strikes plan). Firth notes that this is just one part of the government’s costs, and he has other FOI requests out for other parts. He also notes, per Ofcom, that the agency hopes to get this money back from fees from copyright holders making use of the process, but that’s not guaranteed. Definitely an interesting bit of information to explore, which usually gets ignored in these discussions.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “How Much Does It Cost Taxpayers To Implement Three Strikes?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
E. Zachary Knight (profile) says:

Here is another question

Instead of asking how much it costs the tax payers, I would like to pose the following question:

How much is this legislation likely to cost the overall economy?

This means, how many services will have to shutter their websites in order to prevent people from falling victim to this legislation? How many people will move out of the country to bypass these laws and take their skills elsewhere? How many people will be blocked from purchasing from online companies or earning an honest living using the internet as a result of these laws?

I want to see the governments of these nations try to quantify that.

Anonymous Coward says:

So it costs about $10M and they expect to make that back, meaning it will probably be free but there’s a chance it won’t be. This isn’t much of a story. I’m sure you’ll have another story here soon about how stupid IP laws are and how the sky is falling because of it. Must be slow today. Don’t worry, I’m sure you’ll make something up. You always do.

The eejit (profile) says:

Re: Re:

You miss the point that this is just to the Government. Aside from the costs to the ISPs in enforcing the DEA, as well as the costs (which will be passed on to consumers eventually).

That ?5mil figure is just the start, and is wasteful spending that could be cut, instead of the Surestart program, which has a noticable effect on children.

James Firth (profile) says:

Recouping ?6m...

Look at it another way – the music industry expects to recoup this ?6m investment somehow, either by suing a significant proportion of repeat “infringers” or getting more music sales.

Since all studies to date (2 authoritative) plus anecdotal evidence (Guy sells a million eBooks at 99c – nets $350,000) show that lowering price is the key to making more money from legitimate download sales I’d say it’s probably not option 2.

So they need to recoup ?6m from suing repeat “offenders”. But by the tone of recent judgements they’re going to have a job proving the ISP account holder is liable for what’s happening on their network, so essentially that’s ?6m down the pan.

And the government? Well they’re locked in now too. If they don’t implement this, it’s ?6m wasted that they’ll never get back. At least when warning letters start landing on doormats the taxpayer is going to start seeing some returns (all but the ?215,626.49 sent on non-reimbursable items).

So yes, I think it’s a big deal.


Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...