Another Smart Copyright Ruling In Spain: Google Not Liable For User Upload
from the recognizing-liability dept
Just a few weeks after a German court ruled that YouTube was somehow responsible for copyright infringement done by users, a Spanish court has ruled in the exact opposite manner. Basically, the court properly recognized that Google is the tool that is used, and that it should not be responsible for the infringing behavior of its users. The court also properly notes that YouTube makes it easy (I’d argue, perhaps too easy) to remove content that a copyright holder believes is infringing. This is, of course, similar to the Viacom ruling here in the US.
It’s also no surprise that a Spanish court has ruled this way. Spanish courts have ruled over and over and over and over again that liability should be applied towards the actual infringer, rather than the third party tool provider. This is basic common sense, but it’s resulted in a misleading media campaign by the entertainment industry falsely claiming that Spain is somehow weak on copyright.
Properly applying liability to the party actually responsible is not being “weak,” it’s being accurate and fair. It’s nice to see Spain recognize this. Hopefully, Germany figures this out at some point as well.
Filed Under: liability, spain, videos
Companies: google, youtube
Comments on “Another Smart Copyright Ruling In Spain: Google Not Liable For User Upload”
Leading the way
Good to see that Spain getting this correct, just wish the rest of the governments would see the blatantly obvious.
Re: Leading the way
Sadly, most things are only blatantly obvious in retrospect. Especially if one’s field of view is limited to the interior of one’s posterior.
Re: Re: Leading the way
“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Well it makes sense
To me, it makes sense for big corporations to go after 3rd parties instead of the individual. The money just isn’t there when going after the small guys.
I know here in the US they sued a couple of people over downloading music illegally and won. The person now owes something like $4 million for downloading music. Yah, they are never going to see that money.
It’s not “weak”, it’s smart on there part. And when they stop chasing money, the world will finally change (Yeah, probably never).
Re: Well it makes sense
To me, it makes sense for big corporations to go after 3rd parties instead of the individual. The money just isn’t there when going after the small guys.
So, they should go after the money, even if those with the money didn’t actually *do* anything wrong?
Please explain.
I know here in the US they sued a couple of people over downloading music illegally and won. The person now owes something like $4 million for downloading music. Yah, they are never going to see that money.
Same question as above.
It’s not “weak”, it’s smart on there part. And when they stop chasing money, the world will finally change (Yeah, probably never).
Same question as above.
Re: Re: Well it makes sense
i can see the corporate logic… taking profit into account as the only factor, they should go after the third parties if they can possibly win. they’ll get more money out of it.
doesn’t make it Right, of course.
hopefully Spain can continue to not suck in this regard. it’s nice to see ‘the system’ getting it right, ya know?
Re: Well it makes sense
…
Can we get less anecdotal evidence and more fact here?
Re: Well it makes sense
It would be smart, if those same lawyers weren’t acting completely incompetently.