Just Because You Make Money, It Doesn't Mean You Lose Section 230 Safe Harbors

from the well,-that's-good dept

When talking about the importance of Section 230 safe harbors, one thing I’ve seen multiple people declare is that if a site earns money directly from content on a site, such safe harbors no longer apply. However, a recent court ruling points out this is simply not true. The case involved New Jersey’s attorney general suing an online ticket reseller because some of the site’s users had offered concert tickets for a Bruce Springsteen show before they were even available. But rather than going after the folks who actually posted/sold the tickets, the focus was on the site, TicketNetwork, which is operated by CheapTickes and branded by Orbitz. One of the arguments used against the site, was that since it made money on every transaction, safe harbors like Section 230 do not apply. Thankfully, the court rejected that:

The fact that the defendants charge “service” or “administrative” fees is irrelevant to the CDA analysis. Plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from “advertising and selling concert tickets to consumers without actually having those tickets in their possession or control.” This conduct, however, conduct [sic] fits squarely within the CDA’s purview.

Nice to see a court get things like this right. As Eric Goldman notes above, it’s especially surprising, because courts rarely side against the government in so-called “consumer protection”-type lawsuits, such as this one.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: cheaptickets, ticketnetwork

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Just Because You Make Money, It Doesn't Mean You Lose Section 230 Safe Harbors”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
hirklins (user link) says:

Traffic Siphone on law harbour

If you heard about traffic siphon, mark and george are top IM just release a new revolution technique. This is a great technique. I wait for almost 2 weeks for mark & george publish it.. anyway just to share some blogs that describe in more honest way..


they give details screenshot in the VIP area. Good luck with your online business. P/S i personally advice to test the video no1. on traffic siphon. I manage to make money after 5 days of using it. Have fun and be responsible towards all the tips ya… highly dangerous for non serious marketers.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...