Lawyer Sues Opposing Lawyer For Defamation

from the careful-what-you-say dept

You don’t see this one every day. A lawyer is suing the opposing lawyer in a high profile controversial case about a teenaged runaway, claiming that the opposing lawyer defamed him, by saying in a TV interview that he was “unqualified” and “that he has terrorist ties.” While the latter clearly could be defamatory (the former might be… but seems more like a statement of opinion, not fact), it does make you wonder if such a lawsuit really is effective in preventing “damage to his reputation.” I would think that most people would recognize the statements in context, rather than automatically assuming they were true.

Filed Under: ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Lawyer Sues Opposing Lawyer For Defamation”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: If only...

Problem is that they reproduce exponentially, because they are, in reality, viruses.

This may surprise you, but think about it:

Lawyers seek a host and infect him, drain him of resources (usually crippling him or killing him in the process) and, in the end, just leave that host and seek a new one. They also serve no useful purpose, other than reproducing themselves (and crippling/killing hosts).

They have a complex and interesting outer shell, but really not much inside once you take a good look. Also notice that, like viruses, they also don’t attack their own kind (although some weird mutations sometimes happen that may cause that).

They also have interesting ways of spreading themselves around. Some viruses are airborne, seeking new hosts through a process called “word-of-mouth”, where previous hosts help them spread to new hosts simply by saying good things about them. Others remain dormant until someone enters in contact with them. Physical contact is often not necessary. A phone call could be sufficient.

The only way to really kill the viruses is to kill all potential hosts, or hope someone invents a cure, that generally works by blocking the reproduction mechanism of the viruses. But these so called “cures” have proven ineffective, as the ever growing population of lawyers attests.

/totally offtopic

baditup (profile) says:

"I would think that most people would recognize the statements in context, rather than automatically assuming they were true."

Yes, one logical person might think that, however the vast majority of people have NO common sense or logic and their belief process starts before their thinking process so they’re already preconditioned to accept what they hear/read as fact. Humanity fail.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...