White House Cyber Security Guy: There Is No Cyberwar

from the now-if-only-the-rest-of-the-press-would-recognize-this dept

We recently wrote how some special interests have been playing up the idea that there’s some sort of cyberwar going on that the US is losing. Of course, there have been similar claims going back for a decade, without anything to support it. Are there state-supported hackers breaking into computers of other countries? Absolutely. Does that reach the level of “cyberwar”? Not at all. At best its a bit of espionage and maybe a tiny bit of sabotage, but escalating it to the cyberwar level only is good for companies trying to sell “solutions.” Thankfully, it sounds like there’s actually some sanity in the White House over this, as the top cybersecurity adviser to the president, Howard Schmidt, is playing down the whole “cyberwar” rhetoric in an interview with Wired:

“There is no cyberwar,” Schmidt told Wired.com in a sit-down interview Wednesday at the RSA Security Conference in San Francisco.

“I think that is a terrible metaphor and I think that is a terrible concept,” Schmidt said. “There are no winners in that environment.”

Instead, Schmidt seems to be focused on the real issue: espionage. Hopefully, Schmidt’s view prevails, and other politicians aren’t swept into the moral panic around a non-existent “cyberwar.”

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “White House Cyber Security Guy: There Is No Cyberwar”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
kid mercury (profile) says:

of relevance to this article is a document entitled Information Operation Roadmap that was declassified by the Pentagon due to a Freedom of Information Act request by the National Security Archive at George Washington University. you can download the document in pdf format here: http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB177/info_ops_roadmap.pdf . the document was signed and authorized by donald rumsfeld during his time as secretary of defense (note the department of defense was known as the department of war up until 1947. nice PR move!).

here are two excerpts from the document:

“We Must Fight the Net. DoD [Department of Defense] is building an information-centric force. Networks are increasingly the operational center of gravity, and the Department must be prepared to “fight the net.” ” – 6

“DoD’s “Defense in Depth” strategy should operate on the premise that the Department will “fight the net” as it would a weapons system.” – 13

Karl (profile) says:

Administration schizophrenia

I’ve noticed that there’s a huge amount of contradictions in the White House with regards to tech issues. On the one hand, you have people like this; on the other, you have people who want ACTA treaties and copyright czars.

I’m firmly convinced that this is some sort of clash between President Obama (who has a pretty solid commitment to openness) and Joe Biden (who has one of the worst tech records of anyone in Washington).

Anonymous Coward says:

Enough Wars

It was President Johnson that declared war on poverty. Then Nixon got an a roll and declared war on crime, drugs, and cancer. Now we’ve got the war on terror. That’s at least 5 wars the US has going on in addition to various land wars. Isn’t that enough wars for any country or do we really need to add the cyberwar?

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Fixing our vulnerabilities

The cyberwar theme is idiotic, and always has been. It’s good to see someone in the administration saying so.

There are risks, of course, but no existential ones — or there shouldn’t be, anyway. If it’s possible to pose an existential threat to the US (or any other nation) through the internet, the solution is obvious and relatively cheap & easy: disconnect the vital systems from the internet. They should never have been hooked up here in the first place (and most aren’t.)

Cyberwar (user link) says:

No Cyberwar? Silly...

Wow, several experts statements have contradicted Schmidt. Just a few, FBI Director Robert Mueller, and former director of national intelligence Michael McConnell.

We have seen everything from military system invasion to predator drone signal hacking. How are we not in a cyber war?

I see this as a political statement. Just as Obama canceled the term “Global War On Terror” to sooth Muslim allies, I see this “There is no Cyber War” as a tactic to smooth things out with China over recent accusations against them.


Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...