German Court Says Data Retention Rules Are Illegal

from the privacy-trumps dept

Around the world, law enforcement has pushed for stronger data retention rules for years, despite little evidence that it actually helps stop crimes (in fact, there’s evidence that it helps to obscure important data by burying the data in tons of more data). Yet, since law enforcement and the media can team up to create moral panics, politicians usually end up passing such laws. However, over in Germany, the highest German court has ruled that the data retention law passed in 2008 is illegal, saying that “the law’s erosion of personal privacy outweighed its usefulness in combating terrorism.” Furthermore, the court has ordered that data retained under the law should be destroyed immediately. The court noted that the German law went well beyond EU requirements and potentially harmed the rights of German citizens by having them feel like they’re under constant observation:

The storage of data could “cause a diffusely threatening feeling of being under observation that can diminish an unprejudiced perception of one’s basic rights in many areas,”

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “German Court Says Data Retention Rules Are Illegal”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
wasn't me man says:

HE went THATA way

and ya know that court is right. When you feel that way you will get more irritable and they know that this is pushing to far and see that if they dont stop this stupidity that serious consequences are going to start.

try it …sleep on your front porch all summer.
shower with a camera , have no privacy anywhere.

go ahead i dare you.

Cathy (user link) says:

Religion registration

When I lived in Germany in 2005 I had to register with the town and *tell them my religion*. Ostensibly this was to figure out how to tax the local churches (based on how much of the population was using them) but it made me really uncomfortable, as someone Jewish, telling the German government that. What were my data protection rights there?

jd (profile) says:

Re: Religion registration

They do this to distribute the taxes TO the churches. Each working citizen who claims a religion pays a church tax (mandatory, federally enforced tithing). That money is then distributed based on the number of people registered to each religious group. It is possible to register with no specific religion so that one does not have to pay that tax.

That being said, I would still feel weird registering as Jewish. I get kinda nervous because I don’t register as Catholic.

gh says:

Re: Re: Religion registration

But only a handful of religious organizations in Germany prefer the government to collect their tithing by payroll taxes. It’s namely the Catholic Church, the Jewish Council and the Protestant Church.

Most smaller religious groups (like all Evangelical churches and the Latter-Day Saints) collect their tithing independently from the government by asking their members to pay their share.

In Germany a church has to register with the state government and be officially recognized a so called Entity of Public Law in order to collect money through payroll taxes and be able to teach their religion in public schools. Most churches won’t do this. Though the Latter Day-Saints are for example registered in the state of Hesse. But they do not collect any taxes. (profile) says:

Don't be too happy

The german high court only said that the law in it’s current form is unconstituional (basically telling politians what sloppy job they’ve done yet again crafting legislation) but that collecting data on all communications generally is allowed! Only the access to it will be restricted.

So all politicians have to do is to come up with a less broad law citing certain felonys it applies to (like terrorism) and the surveillance technology can remain in place. To top it all off the court also hinted at the idea that giving rights holders access to IP adresses to start civil lawsuits against alleged filesharers would be ok.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...