Inventor Involved In Patent Troll Tracker Lawsuit Arrested For Weapons Stockpiling

from the exactly-what-the-founding-fathers-had-in-mind dept

Sometimes you come across stories so odd, you just don’t know how to classify them. You may have heard, recently, about the New England man, Gregory Girard, who was arrested for illegal weapons stockpiling in his home. The guy, who claimed that he believed Armageddon was quickly approaching, had recently told his wife both, “It’s fine to shoot people in the head because traitors deserve it,” and “Don’t talk to people, shoot them instead.” Not surprisingly, he’s being held without bail for being too dangerous.

So, what does that have to do with stuff we write about here? As noted at The Prior Art, Girard is the inventor and claimed patent holder at the center of the high-profile patent infringement lawsuit that involved Rick Frenkel, who had been the anonymous guy behind the still greatly missed Patent Troll Tracker blog. As you may recall, Frenkel was sued for defamation in East Texas, after he had questioned the legitimacy of a date change on a patent lawsuit filed against Cisco (where Frenkel worked at the time). Basically, the lawsuit appeared to have been filed the day before the patent was granted and then, magically, the date changed. The lawyers involved suggested it was an honest mistake, but others suspected otherwise.

Either way, Frenkel’s case settled, and (separately) the judge just recently tossed out the patent infringement lawsuit against Cisco that resulted in all of this, after realizing that it appeared that Girard and the holding company he had set up for lawsuits involving this patent didn’t actually own the patent in question. Girard had developed the invention while employed by another company, which was working on similar technology, and Girard’s own employment agreement said he would automatically assign any inventions over to the company. Still, during the lawsuit, Girard’s lawyers tried to play him up as an All-American inventor:

“Mr. Girard is exactly what the founding fathers had in mind when they penned the Patent Clause in the basic Article I of the U.S. Constitution.”

But perhaps not what they had in mind when they penned the rest of the Constitution.

Filed Under: ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Inventor Involved In Patent Troll Tracker Lawsuit Arrested For Weapons Stockpiling”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
20 Comments
Wesley Franklin says:

Inventor Involved In Patent Troll Tracker Lawsuit Arrested For Weapons Stockpiling

The answer to your question is that the arrest and charges should have nothing to do with what you write about unless, as it appears, you are a shill for the Ciscos of the world who want to advance a proprietary view of how the patent system should work through fronts like the Patent Troll Tracker. At the very least, you could report the facts fully. The court docket in Girard’s case in Texas shows that the dismissal has been appealed to the Federal Circuit Court and the order granting the motion to dismiss shows that Cisco was fined $100,000 because of behavior during discovery by Charles Verhoeven, Cisco’s lead counsel described by the judge as “predicated upon the presence of such factors as willful disobedience, gross indifference to the right of the adverse party, deliberate callousness or gross negligence”.

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re: Inventor Involved In Patent Troll Tracker Lawsuit Arrested For Weapons Stockpiling

The answer to your question

I didn’t ask a question.

as it appears, you are a shill for the Ciscos

I am hardly a “shill” for Cisco. I have never done any work for Cisco of any kind and either way, editorial on this site has never been and never will be for sale. Why would I ever risk my reputation in that manner?

Furthermore, my position on patent reform differs greatly from Cisco’s. But why would that matter to you when you don’t want to listen and just want to pretend what I have to say is meaningless?

At the very least, you could report the facts fully.

I wrote what I wrote based on the original article. If you feel it is incomplete, take it up with the original article’s author.

The court docket in Girard’s case in Texas shows that the dismissal has been appealed to the Federal Circuit Court

Standard operating procedure, so why even mention it?

Cisco was fined $100,000 because of behavior during discovery by Charles Verhoeven, Cisco’s lead counsel described by the judge as “predicated upon the presence of such factors as willful disobedience, gross indifference to the right of the adverse party, deliberate callousness or gross negligence”.

Again, totally meaningless to the story, so why waste space on it?

Until you are my editor, unfortunately, I don’t take writing cues from you. Sorry.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...