Can't Buy 'Em? Sue 'Em For Patent Infringement!

from the welcome-to-modern-business dept

JohnForDummies alerts us to Broadcom’s latest patent infringement suit, this time against Emulex. Broadcom is quite aggressive on the patent front, so at first this didn’t seem like a big deal. But, this time it’s more interesting, because Broadcom just spent about a year trying to do a hostile takeover of Emulex, which failed. Basically, this seems like a sour grapes patent lawsuit. Emulex wouldn’t agree to be taken over, so Broadcom decided to throw the patent book at them. Patent lawsuits as revenge? Just like Thomas Jefferson intended…

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: broadcom, emulex

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Can't Buy 'Em? Sue 'Em For Patent Infringement!”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Dark Helmet (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Somebody sue Mikey already

“Didn’t your mom tell you not to play XBox games everyday, you, stupid punk ?”

….uh, no, but as a substitute teacher in the high school I attended, she did alert me to the proper use of spacing, capitalization, and comma usage. Don’t they practice those basic grammar techniques in Russian? I thought the did.

GOD you’re my favorite little gremlin….

Dark Helmet (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Somebody sue Mikey already

Wow, that was a pretty good one. But are we seriously going to let this thread deteriorate into a series of Yo Mama jokes?

What’s odd about this story is that Broadcom seems EXTREMELY geared up to acquire Emulex, so much so that they offered to buy out the company’s shareholders at a 40% premium, and then raising that number AGAIN when the initial takeover was rejected.

I can’t help but remember the hoax involving Emulex floating a report that their Prez/CEO was stepping down in order to deflate stock pricing. With that kind of history, might we need a deeper look at this?

captn, trips says:

Re: Somebody sue Mikey already

He’s infringing on hundreds of patents every time he turns on his computer?? Lots of patents exist that could be thrown at Mike.

Not only that but you dont even have to have one that would win, just one that you could have heard through multiple iterations of appeals so as to sufficiently bankrupt him with legal fees… Which is how the surgically precise baseball bat that is the US patent circus works after all.

WammerJammer (profile) says:

Get them any way you can

Still thinking that a patent will or copyright will save you. Ask the Republican Party in the US. They don’t observe copyrights.
What good are patents or copyrights. They are simply pieces of paper SOLD by a government that does not police or protect your rights. It requires a private company to police your public rights. Sounds like bullshit and a paper scam. Money for nothing.
When was the last time the government protected your rights?
Are you done laughing yet??

Anonymous Coward says:


@Darkhelmet, Mechwarrior, Call me Al .. This is somewhat serious, you have destroyed any credibility that other contributers might have made with your slash dot foolishness. Seriously.. /. had to implement a system to filter this noise out in order to stay viable. TechDirt has no such system and your making us all look like 14 year old boys with a cause that we couldn’t possibly understand.

@Darkhelmet: You seem to have lots of sometimes witty, usually off topic comments locked and loaded. If your not contributing to the discussion your undermining it. Please think about the board and the overall detriment that it incurs when you start a flame war, or some Beavis and Buthed exchange..

I expect some sort of snippy reply (with lots of snips/quotes) but this is really not intended to offend, just inform you of how your working for the other side when you start, or contribute to a flame war.

Call me Al says:

Re: Adolescence

A little touch of silliness is nothing to object about and certainly doesn’t “destroy credibility” of the more sensible and well thought out comments. Though I agree we should be restrained and try to stick to the topic by and large.

This does seem to be one of those typical abuses of patents. Certainly they have appeared a lot in the limited time that I have been reading Techdirt. Is anyone in a position to say whether there are more or less of this kind of cases these days then in times gone by?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...