Why Would Selling Equity In A Domain Name Deserve A Patent?

from the isn't-selling-equity-selling-equity? dept

Brad Feld, one of the increasing number of VCs who’s grown skeptical of the value of patents (software patents in particular) alerts us that domain registrar GoDaddy has apparently applied for a patent on selling shares of equity in a domain name. You can see the application itself, which only has six claims and seems pretty straightforward. It’s only an application, so there’s still a decent chance this gets rejected — but the very fact that anyone even thought it was worth applying for such a patent is quite telling. It’s difficult to see what is new or unique about what’s in the patent, other than it applies the standard process of selling equity in anything to a domain name.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: godaddy

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Why Would Selling Equity In A Domain Name Deserve A Patent?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
BullJustin (profile) says:

It's a new trader's market

Seems like they want to control the ability to buy and sell domain names in an open market. Imagine if you could buy 20 shares in candy.com and then collect rent for someone using that domain name. It’s actually a kind of interesting idea in that it would allow domain squatters another avenue to monetize their domain holdings.

standingskeleton (user link) says:

Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 6th, 2009 @ 5:31pm

Word is the big players are strategizing the names spectrum as for their corporate weapons, is largely where monetization and valuations exceed so then go figure. Supply and demand if even it’s ‘i wouldn’t waste resources on a worthless name. Some in fact are estimated in the millions. Some billions!

anon says:

Re: Re:

That happens when the federal reserve sets the rate at which banks recieves money from it artifically low like after the dot com bust. Then they print money out of thin air (they’ve been doing it since they were founded in 1913 with the net result of having eroded %95 of the dollars value) that creates a false sense of economic prosperity that causes investors to invest in things they wouldn’t invest in if they had a clearer picture of the actual economic situation. And like the rule of gravity everything that goes up, must come down eventually everyone discovers that the economic situation wasn’t as good as it appeared and the bad investments made need to clear the system.

If you want to know more read about austrian economics it is the only school of economics that predicted this situation as opposed the keynesian school whom the government continues to rely on and follow as we speak. In case you didn’t know.

teka says:

This patent application follows the ever so popular concept of “X + Internet = New and patentable”

buying groceries? well.. try buying them.. online!
researching real estate? well.. try doing it Online!
Creating a new Dotcom Bubble? well.. try it.. online Again?

Patent office really needs to get their head around the idea that slapping “Online!” onto something does not make it new or special.

Standingskeleton (user link) says:

Re: Response to: teka on Jul 6th, 2009 @ 10:15pm

All is reflective of the socalled creative financing that got housing real estate so way far off gaintrack. Now more property to molest. Why can’t entrepreneur investors who want to enlarge their financial borders stay within the financial lines and limits under u.s. laws. When ready then welcome over to the world of property appreciation and what for example the estimated worth of a domain name like online.comtoday minmum $28.02 million. Dah!

Standing skeleton (user link) says:

estimating worth of powerful domains

There are no inline defects or flaws to a domain name such as
weatherreference.com and considering each word single tiered as a dotcom is estimated to be worth far more than $10,000,000 other than two or three
We though can reference’ (like yahoonews.com $300 million more than yahoo.com) we only lack precedent in starting out to raise two or even three tiered name conciousness abroad. Of course we’re speaking to only names broadly acknowledged worth something notable. Randy

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...