British Cops Creating Nationwide License-Plate Surveillance System

from the orwellian dept

Britain is working hard to maintain its place as a leading surveillance society. Building on the massive “success” of its widespread use of CCTV cameras, police are now installing a system that will use the cameras to track and log car journeys. CCTV cameras across the UK are being added to the system, which automatically recognizes and stores license plate numbers, then adds them, and the location in which they were spotted, to a central database. Police, of course, say the system’s great at reducing and solving crime, and one police bigwig says that arrests are up 40% in his area since cops started using the system. But just because arrests have increased, it doesn’t necessarily mean crime has been reduced. He further defends the system by saying “innocent people have nothing to fear from the way we use it” — which all too often is used as an attempt to justify pretty nasty governmental intrusions on privacy and liberty. This system sounds like another part of Britain’s attempt to record the lives of its subjects in databases, alongside its database of info on every child in the country, and details of all the internet and phone traffic there. Will people there get up in arms over all this government surveillance, or are they saving their ire only for the likes of Google Street View?

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “British Cops Creating Nationwide License-Plate Surveillance System”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
ED says:

Re: 'Brazil' and '1984" are becoming reality.

The UK isn’t heading towards a becoming police state – it already is one.

Top 10 list of police state measures:

Local councils in the UK now put RFID tags in rubbish bins to monitor the amount of waste created by each household with a view to enforcing a “recycling tax.”

The UK government has now put a RFID chip into passports and the Oyster card records details on every journey made.

Drivers will have an RFID chip installed in their car and be forced to pay for every mile they drive.

Do you want to make your voice heard? Well, if you want to protest in the centre of London you now have to apply for permission from the police.

The government now plans to install X-Ray cameras in a bid to combat “terrorism”.

Children can now have their biometric data taken from them at school without their parents consent.

There are now cameras that shout orders at people who “misbehave” in the street.

Schools justify the complete loss of privacy for children by saying it cuts down on vandalism and bullying.

Police now want powers to take DNA samples from people on the street for petty offences such as speeding or dropping litter.

Under section 44 of the Terrorism Act police officers can search you without the need to show that an offence is being committed. Not only that, but even if you are innocent you can be held for 28 days without charge.

Hush says:

Re: Speed Citations...

Actually this has been going on for a number of years. The police have been linking speed recognition cameras together over stretches of road and timing you entering and exiting the stretch. If it deems that you exited the area too soon you are sent a fine and get 3 points on your license. They call then Average Speed Cameras.

This country is getting beyond a joke – I will be emergrating at the earliest opportunity.

claire rand says:


works really well against people who have legally registered thier car to their actual address and who make a minor slip.

or crooks who are stupid enough to use their own car

does sweet FA for unregistered cars though.

i can see the point of this and don’t have any actual privicy concerns, it makes it possible to prove where a car when, but not who was in it. not i have no concerns with the plod knowing where cars are.

but it may well lead to more arrests, however that figure alone means nothing. how many *convictions* does it lead to is the correct measure.

David says:

I not like!

I don’t like the sound of this at all. It was kept petty quiet, which is very ominous and I DEFINITELY don’t like the idea of logs being kept for two years. Wacky Jacqui loves it of course. The whole surveillance thing is getting completely out of hand. Wonder if the EU will step in, as they did on innocent folks’ DNA being kept unecessarily by the UK plod?

Jim Arnold (user link) says:

Not good

This is the first I have heard of this. They are obviously keeping it very hush hush, to stop public outcry. This is an invasion of privacy and will more than likely develop into something much larger. As they will now know when we are away from our homes, I wonder if they will do more to police the area while we are away…

Jim –
uk web hosting / reseller hosting

David says:

Re: Privacy

It’s not different, Sos – all are somewhat objectionable and together become quite unacceptable and paranoia inducing. And the reason for that is that the ‘For our own good’ line is rubbish! That would be ok if the legal system here was somehow trustworthy but everything here seems to prove the opposite. They can survey as much as they like if the legal system worked, but when you see the ridiculous things some people get into trouble over and the serious things that some people DONT get into trouble over – or where stupid harmless things are illegal and where really nasty and destructive or prejudiced stuff is still considered acceptable – that is when you start to worry about them having too much power to track you and watch you. Because the trust is totally gone. I dont know what it is like elsewhere in the world – but that’s the UK! I live in the UK and i am also constantly amazed at how much invasion of privacy we are happy to put up with here. And also how thoughtlessly accepting people as a whole tend to be of this kind of stupidity from above. And it has to be as a whole, because what can a few people getting angry do about it? Anonymous Coward – you are right in your first comment. Dont bother coming here!

huckle says:

It's cool with me

I’m British and I don’t mind that much. There are very strict laws about who can actually view the data, when it has to be destroyed, etc., and I trust the police force to be as diligent with the information they collect as possible.

I am not a fan of the DNA database – or rather the unwillingness to remove data on it when people are either not charged or are proven innocent, but the EU is sorting that out for us.

I think people just need to relax about the whole thing myself. Just as the “you should have nothing to hide” ethos is abhorrent, if you don’t want to be seen out in public, don’t go out in public! I don’t care if My friends or complete strangers see me walking down the street, why should an authorised police officer looking to identify a missing person or wanted person?

The biggest argument against the no. plates recognition system is cost, not invasion of privacy. I can happily sit on a street corner and note down which cars pass me – what difference is there if an automated system does it?

What I do actually disagree with is the blocking of sites which the govt/police reckon I shouldn’t be seeing. But I am ok with them having access to my records to see if I am looking at sites which may mean I am committing a crime, if that makes sense.

Anyway, will all you Americans stop call us Brits idiots? If we are making mistakes then they are ours to make so butt out.

zerojj says:

are you really surprised?

Many police departments here in the good ole’ US of A (Texas) are already doing platescanning. Cameras mounted on patrol cars (ala Google Earth) can OCR plate numbers and run it against a database to help law enforcement recover stolen vehicles or track down warrant subjects. You can bet that there are no federal guidelines on how long the data is stored or to what extents the information is used for.

Terry Wagar says:

open murder conspiracy in portland oregon

Eric Carlson and Joan Wagar, A,K,A, Doubleclick and Mrs Dash,( yes those are there nicknames they gave each other.) admitted to poisoning me while I was a plasma donor back in 2005.
Eric Carlson pedofied me behind prison walls and then framed me as a pedophile on march 26th 2007, I caught the crime on a audio recorder I put in Joan’s purse.
there were people in authority helping them with this and nobody in authority will help they pretend nothing happened and refuse to investigate this.
Eric Carlson changed his hair color and his name to Gashel and Clackamas Walmart was hiding him from my Family by pretending He’s someone else but this is not hidden, only ignored by the authority’s and media
I’m disabled from being poisoned and the hospitals refuse to admit I’m poisoned.
My Family is in danger from these people and I have no other recourse but to make these charges public.
My name is Terry Wagar,I’m from Portland Oregon and I’m backing up these charges.
I have been threatened with harassment charges by a Sargent Walker, She is a Portland Police officer stationed at the OHSU hospital, for the non crime of reporting a multi murder conspiracy within that hospital.
They dont give a s4!t Joan and Eric was poisoning a plasma donor!
And how many god damn John Ray’s in authority are there in portland oregon!
You damn serial killer.
Where did Mrs Dash keep her stash? in A Garlic Salt Shaker!
What did Doubleclick do with his Dick? You Pedo!
Why you hiding A body double for Clackamas Walmart?
Cover this up Sgt Walker!
We have our Witch hunts right here in Portland Oregon, and they use it to justify murder.
The Authority’s call it “Pedofied” it means they just run around spreading rumors about someone they want dead, they label that person A pedophile, turning hundreds of people against that person overnight.
It makes it easy to get volunteer’s to lie for them so they can murder off that person.
And no one complains, thinking to themselves “One less pedophile to worry about.

It’s A great responsibility to report A crime the Authority’s don’t want reported!

CJ says:

I like how we assume the US Government isn’t doing the same bloody thing already. How we pretend that the warrantless wire-tapping is the complete extent of the government’s secret syping on the populace. Let’s face it, we’re all being spied on, no government really cares about the privacy of its citizens when it comes down to it, and in the end I don’t know that it makes any difference.

Crime doesn’t really decrease, we’re probably not really any more or less likely to be mistakenly harrassed over something we didn’t do. If anything, we probably have more privacy because the government is trying to wade through an insane amount of discovery on every person in the country.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...