Just Because A Site Has A Privacy Policy, Doesn't Mean It Will Keep Your Data Private

from the that's-how-it-works dept

Last week there was a fair amount of coverage of the fact that Canadian regulatory agency, CRTC, had revealed private data on its website. That story, by itself, is interesting enough, but the followup from the CRTC was even more interesting. It claimed that since the CRTC’s privacy policy stated that any data you gave it was a part of the public record, it was fine:

Note that all information you provide as part of a public process, except information granted confidentiality, whether sent by postal mail, facsimile, e-mail or through the Commission’s website at www.crtc.gc.ca, becomes part of a publicly accessible file and will be posted on the Commission’s website. This information includes your personal information, such as your full name, e-mail address, postal/street address, telephone and facsimile number(s), and any other personal information you provide.

Fair enough, right? After all, the privacy policy states right out that the data will be revealed. Except… as we’ve noted in the past, most people falsely believe that if a site has any privacy policy, it means their data will be safe. This situation highlights this exactly. Most people assumed that the existence of a privacy policy itself meant the data would be kept private — even though the policy itself says otherwise. Most people never bother to read the policy, and assume privacy policy = privacy. The truth, of course, was that the CRTC’s “privacy policy” was actually a “non-privacy policy,” but most people had no idea.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: crtc

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Just Because A Site Has A Privacy Policy, Doesn't Mean It Will Keep Your Data Private”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Off topic

Such omissions from the fact often come back to haunt the service provider.

You can divert attention for a short while, but even being a Government Agency doesn’t put the group above the law.

A slightly amusing fact is that SARS was an issue five years ago, oddly, almost to the day. If I recall, then the Whitehouse was fighting torture and prisoner abuse. Ultimately, SARS never came, but the focus by news organizations overtook the public’s attention. Much like today’s Swine Flu. Pig Flu. How inventive and convenient that the contextual subject matter is the same and they desire similar results. I guess when it gets too hot, the puppetmasters drum up a little flu-based fear.

The CRTC should consider what happened to Google when it didn’t have a privacy policy.

Zaphod (profile) says:

My policy...

Ya know, since I use google adsense on my site, perhaps I should start my privacy policy with the simple line…

“CAVEAT: Usage of this site veritably guarantees some of your information, will be disclosed to me, and some third parties.”

Then they can weed through the morass of sargassosistic legaleese knowing that at least they have been warned…

And I just did this before hitting the submit button here.

Honesty can be so refreshing.

Steve R. (profile) says:

Everything is for Sale

Virtually every privacy policy that I have read has an intro phrase that implies how they will “protect” your data that is immediately followed by another phrase that they will “share” your data with anyone who asks (pays).

You are automatically opted into this policy. To opt out you have to do all sorts of convoluted things, such as manually entering your information and using snail mail. So here we have computers that make things easy to give your data away; but when it comes to opting out, the companies make it as difficult as possible.

As an interesting aside. Today I received my copy of Forbes. One of the lead articles was the debate over “your” medical records. My first thought, what does Forbes mean by “your” medical records??? Companies are routinely and with greater vigor claiming that they “own” all data that is in their possession.

another mike says:

google's privacy policy

Didn’t this come up before when some privacy rights group was braying about Google’s front page not having a link to their privacy policy? It’s Google, if anyone wanted to know their privacy policy they’d just Google it. Speaking of that, that’s exactly what Google should’ve done. Made it a link to search themselves for “google privacy policy”. lol

Anyway, unless you’ve read through the policy, the TOS, and the EULA, you really have no idea what you’ve signed up for. The webmaster/programmer/site owner could be promising to exploit you for greatest market value. I know I would.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...