Kraft Gets Into The Music Business

from the sponsored-music dept

We’re seeing more and more consumer brands getting involved in the music business. In parts of Asia this sort of thing has become a lot more common, but we’re seeing it more and more in the west as well, such as when Tag body spray started its own record label, or when Groove Armada signed with Bacardi, rather than a record label. Now, Raimund Ostrowski points us to this story about Kraft Canada, which, in an attempt to revive the Triscuits brand, had a musician in Toronto write a 30-second song for a commercial. The commission was then expanded into a full 3 minute song which is getting airplay on the radio and can even be bought at iTunes. While (understandably!) some may not like this sort of commercialization of music, it does show yet again the many other business models that can show up to help pay for the creation of music.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: kraft

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Kraft Gets Into The Music Business”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
33 Comments
R. Miles says:

And then there's the inadvertent success of a song!

A few weeks ago, I was doing an internet search looking for a complete list of Subway’s “5 footlongs for $5” campaign.

What I saw, instead, was a surprising number of people trying to determine the song of the campaign!

It appears the song is very popular with people, so in this example, both Subway and the musician saw increased sales.

I’ve no problem with businesses using music to sell products (freecreditreport.com’s songs are also cute). While I may not purchase them, it’s good to know others will.

I just hope and hope and hope that Corporate America doesn’t turn the music industry into nothing but advertisements for products, as they’re very well known to do.

The last damn thing I would ever want to hear is a song about Tide, the laundry detergent, no matter how damn good the music is.

But that’s just me. Feel free to disagree.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: And then there's the inadvertent success of a song!

A song about Tide is bad advertising. A song that’s tied to Tide in such a way that when you hear the song you think of the product, is not necessarily a bad idea.

Some car insurance company is using a cover of “16 going on 17” from the Sound of Music in their commercials. It works for the company’s ad because, hey, driving age — but it’s also still a good song (if the stylistic sacrilidge doesn’t turn you off).

Whisk33 says:

Contradiction

Isn’t the fact that the song is being sold on iTunes contradictory of your new business model argument? I mean if it is on iTunes it is digital which means it can be copied and therefore unlimited and should have no cost. I thought selling songs was the old business model? This isn’t a new business model it’s the old one(selling songs) just finding new(arguably new) ways to find their way in. I have a 30sec Gap vest commercial on my zune(I’ve had the file for +6 years).

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Contradiction

Mike’s using the fact that it’s selling on iTunes as proof that the song’s popular. That is, a song done on commission for a 30 second commercial spot has been expended into a full-length song that’s popular enough to draw $0.99 a pop. (iTunes works, even if it’s arguably not the ideal modle; you’re still putting a barrier up.) the ‘new modle’ bit is that this was a commissioned song, not something the band just did on their own initiative. They were paid before the song was made.

mkam (profile) says:

Re: Contradiction

Isn’t the fact that the song is being sold on iTunes contradictory of your new business model argument?

Actually that is just icing on the cake. The point that was being made is that the artist was ‘commissioned’ to make the song. Hence he or she was paid to produce the music which was not in existence yet. This pay for produce is the business model, and if they sell some on iTunes, then so be it.

Shawn says:

Phillip Morris has always been good at marketing

after all in thier food, beer and cigerette lines they have successfully marketed products that have demostrated adverse effects to peoples health, yet they are still quite successful at selling them (whether branded Kraft, Miller or Marlboro). Music should be a walk in the park for them.

Doombringer says:

Holy F***! Are you kidding me?

Anyone who listens to the $5 foot long sandwich jingle in their free time should be shot. Same goes with the free credit report song. I despise those idiots. Everytime those commercials come on I want to hit those a**holes with a 2X4. And if Tool ever did a “Tide” song, I would burn everyone of their CD’s and records I have. But luckily they are a band chock full o’ integrity and artistic vision, so I doubt it will ever come to that, thankfully. There is a word for “musicians” who can only make cheesy commercials and jingles, and that word is hack. Its these people that kill music. What we need is a complete deconstruction of the old system. And a new independant system to be implemented. Throw out everyone one of the industry fat cats, because all they do is come between the musicians and the fans. Go forth and die.

interval says:

Re: Holy F***! Are you kidding me?

@Doombringer: “…if Tool ever did a “Tide” song, I would burn everyone of their CD’s and records I have.”

Cultural Luddite. Not everyone can support an artist with patronage as they did in Medieval Europe, oh great prince.

Oh, you’re not rich? That’s ok. I’m sure your favorite artist can get a pizza delivery job.

Doombringer says:

Re: Re: Holy F***! Are you kidding me?

WTF are you talking about? I dont pay the band Tool in full, I support their art. Are you retarded? I just share the same aesthetic they do about what is acceptable business, and what is sell out horsehit. Yes tool is a popular band, and they have money, so they dont have to do commercials, but the point is they wouldnt choose to do so in the first place. And if they did in some rare case they were brainwashed and forced to do one, I would burn those things in honor of what they once were. Your a prick, and you probably work at a pizza joint. What are you trying to jusitfy, the credit report people and they’re seafood jobs or whatever the fuck? Get a life, you think those sell out assholes need your pity, they make more money selling their souls to corporate suckers of satan’s cock, than you make working at the pizza place.

JvA (user link) says:

State Farm has been trying to do this with their “16 going on 17” song. They say at the end of each commercial that if you like the song, you can download it for free on the State Farm website.

Clever idea… it’s a good way to generate site traffic, and good PR for the band that wrote the song… except that the song embodies the quintessential “uncool” that most teenagers who are ’16 going on 17′ avoid like the plague.

But I have been curious as to the success of this campaign given it’s seemingly uncool nature. Anybody know if they have statistics on this campaign published anywhere?

interval says:

A few months ago I google’d “Cloud Cult”, from the Esurance commercials. I went to their web site and copied three songs they had available. Ultimately their folksy fusion style wasn’t for me. But they got my attention. I really don’t see how this new promotion and distribution age can work any better. The days when a few mighty labels mass produced media and sold it to us becuase we didn’t have any other choice are over. The sooner EVERYONE comes to grip with this simple fact the better it will be for everyone. Top 40 radio marketing, label promotion, and the mass consumption of pre-packaged media: forget about it. The internet has changed EVERYTHING.

Doombringer says:

Re: Re:

And the fact that you went here to the esurance website shows what a fake you are. If you listen to music because it was in a commercial and it “grabbed your attention”, then you are the mass consumer your trying to bash. You cant say shit when you have no principles or shame. Go back take your ADD pills and channel surf for your new favorite artist.

nasch says:

Re: Re: Re:

Where is it morally acceptable to get interested in music? I assume on-hold music and elevator music is out (even if it’s good music such as quality classical music, which I’ve heard). Is the radio OK? Internet radio? Soundtrack to a movie? Where exactly is this line between principled and unprincipled listening to music?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...