Cathay Pacific: Want Free Stuff? Throw An Airport Tantrum

from the adverse-selection dept

About a month ago, somebody posted a video on YouTube of a woman flipping out at the Hong Kong airport after missing her flight. Apparently the person that recorded the woman’s tantrum was an employee of the airline Cathay Pacific, and the airline has now disciplined the worker and thrown a bunch of free stuff at the woman. On one hand, it’s easy to see why the company could feel the need to apologize, since the woman suffered some pretty extreme notoriety, thanks to the video’s 5 million views. But on the other, couldn’t this action tacitly encourage this sort of tantrum and disruptive behavior by rewarding it with free travel? Had a person who wasn’t an airline employee recorded the outburst, perhaps the outcome would have been a bit different, but Cathay Pacific seems to have given the green light to people to flip out in hopes of getting some free stuff. This wouldn’t be the first time such a video has had an effect in Hong Kong: the well-known “Bus Uncle” video from a few years ago caused people there to examine stress and public behavior in its society.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: cathay pacific

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Cathay Pacific: Want Free Stuff? Throw An Airport Tantrum”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
R. Miles says:

I throw tantrums here all the time.

Where the hell is my free stuff, Techdirt?

Never saw the video, but heard about it. This follow-up is astounding, but it’s also something a business needs to do given its “reputation” was partially assaulted by this idiotic woman.

Too bad they didn’t jettison her ass at 30,000 ft.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Was this a public space? Yes? Ok, then she has no right not to be filmed there.

This kind of entitlement attitude should not be rewarded:
— I was filmed acting very immaturely and could not control myself or communicate appropriately to resolve the issue
— I do not know how to express my needs and feelings
==> because I have caused a scene here I should be given free stuff to make up for my suffering

This is simply absurd. What she should be given is a free trip out the front of the airport door, carried there by the security guards.

Dewey says:

Security video

If the company had mounted the camera above the service desk for security purposes I think they’d be like many other companies. There’s not a problem with that is there? Why does it matter that a company rep was using a handheld? I would think that the videotape would have protected the security guard or company official that was trying to deal with her if she had injured herself and then later claimed the employee did it. The fact that it ended up on YouTube is really the problem — not that the video was made. At least I hope that’s the case.

Anonymous Coward says:

to follow up w/ details

factual background// i know someone who knows the family and what actually happened was they had checked into the business class lounge. so they had the boarding passes already. they arrived at the gate before boarding calls came out. elderly gentleman in their party became ill from something served at the lounge. the ground staff instructed the rest of party to wait for him, assured them they would be seated, and refused to allow them to board w/out him.

ultimately, the third individual came around just as they made the last call. there were still people boarding the plane, but they were refused entrance. their luggage had already been checked in. so they were forced to miss their flight and a subsequent business meeting that was scheduled the next day or so. at least that’s what i’ve heard.

legally speaking, recording is fine, but publishing is a different matter. moreover, from an post 9011 FAA policy standpoint, it is against the law to have airplane luggage loaded onto a flight w/out the passenger on board.

Easily Amused says:

Re: to follow up w/ details

I’m sorry but that explanation doesn’t fit at all with the video context. I would also refrain from using the term “factual background” when referring to information gleaned from a friend of a friend of the family that was involved in an incident in a foreign country.

The translations I have found (that aren’t jokes or bad memes) support the original Aussie AP release information found here:

So the woman’s bags were already offloaded and she was only delayed by a couple hours (due to her being late enough to warrant them taking her bags off the plane).

Read more, post less…

Allen (profile) says:

I cant believe the number of commenters that seem to think that there was nothing wrong in an employee filming and releasing this. Cathay saved themselves a bundle in court costs.

No doubt a firmly worded memo was circulated and whoever was responsible disciplined/dismissed. There maybe some fools that are willing to embarrass themselves on a global scale in the hope of a free ticket, but it will be a long time before an employee is stupid enough to record it.

You can count on some fellow traveler to spread the goodness instead.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...