Court Of Appeals Overturns Kentucky Gambling Domain Seizure

from the good-ruling dept

Back in September, the state of Kentucky tried to seize over 100 domain names, claiming they violated a local state law against “gambling devices.” None of the domains were run or hosted in the state of Kentucky, which made this quite a stretch in legal terms. While many of the domain names were for gambling websites, some were merely parked domains. The politicians who ordered the seizure were quite open that this was an attempt to “protect” local gambling interests — but it seems like an incredible legal reach to claim that because of local protectionist laws, the state somehow has the right to seize domain names from around the world. The domain owners complained, but a local Kentucky state court ruled in favor of the government. However, an appeals court quickly told the state to hold off seizing the domains until it could review the case.

That court has now overturned the lower court ruling saying that a domain name is clearly not a gambling device, and is not covered by the law. However, this does potentially leave the door open for Kentucky politicians to change the law to include domain names… at which point we’ll need to go through this whole silly legal battle all over again.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Court Of Appeals Overturns Kentucky Gambling Domain Seizure”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Lonnie E. Holder says:

Re: Re: Re:

uh what? Politicians are old, a generation or more behind, mentally and technology wise. It’s not the kids that are ignorant.

The youngest member of Congress is 27 years old. If that is your definition of old, you must be about 10. And what do you mean “mentally”? Did you just insult everyone over the age of 27? Nice job.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

This is WAY off topic so feel free to skip and hate me for all this text.

I believe this notion that age has much to do with anything is just a cultural misnomer. I would go so far to say the time to start treating children like adults is when they ask adult questions. “Where do babies come from?” I gave my kid a sex education course until he got bored with it. I didn’t tell him a freaking stork comes, blow him off, or tell him some other asinine lie. You want to raise an adult, treat them like an adult. Teach them to be responsible for their actions before the state says “yea, they are an adult now and will be tried as one.” Sure you can make a solid case that pre-puberty they are not fully developed physically or mentally and you need to use some kid gloves, but not flat out lie.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...