Scammers Copying Big Copyright Extortion Tactics

from the learn-from-the-best dept

It really was only a matter of time. For a while now, the entertainment industry has been using borderline extortion tactics with “pre-settlement” letters that promise individuals they won’t get sued if only they pay a fee upfront — ranging from a few hundred dollars to a few thousand. These letters have proven to be incredibly effective in getting people to simply pay up, so it’s no surprise that other scammers have started copying the technique as well. Right now it sounds like they’re simply calling people, but it’s really only a matter of time until they start sending nearly identical “pre-settlement” letters on threatening letterhead, and getting folks to pay up as well. Of course, given the extremely flimsy nature of the evidence often used by the entertainment industry in sending out those letters, we’ll once again note the very fine line between what these supposedly legitimate companies are doing and the out-and-out scammers are doing.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Scammers Copying Big Copyright Extortion Tactics”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
mobiGeek says:

For the most sophisticated

The more sophisticated scam artist could set themselves up as a P2P search engine or whatnot. Attract individuals to download music and movies via their service while logging those requests. Down the road they come up with the contact info for those people (via malware or phishing).

Voila! Send the “Smiths, Jones, Fredericks and Geshtalt” letterhead listing the tracks that the individual downloaded, demanding payment to quash the case.

All the tools for this exist. Hmmmm…..

Mikkie Stevens says:

Re: For the most sophisticated

Really nice to see how blasted scary this whole internet thing has become in just a few short years huh?
I am certainly no expert on any of this techno-geek stuff, but I am not stupid either and all this new threatening people to pay up for using supposedly “free” services is disgusting and immoral in my estimation!

JJ says:

My Plan

With the new copyright laws trying to come into Canada I have already set up things.
Once the Laws comes in I can bulk mail every single Canadian and claim they copyright my work and could pay $100 but if they act quickly I will just charge them $19.95 or they will risk a fully legal action from my team of lawyers. Base on the statistics of stupid people I would get about a 20% return which would be worth millions. It would be gross abuse of the new laws and systems but 100% legal as I just request a small payment or they risk legal action. Nothing in the proposed laws would say I have any proof of such a claim, but if it went to court I would. Nothing says in the law that if I accuse someone of something do I need to pursue it any farther.

D.B. Coupe says:

Textbook publishers have been suing students

Textbook publishers have been suing students for the last few years. According to one of the publisher’s agents settlements run “five figures”. So lucky those below:

whitneymcn (profile) says:

All too common in the business world

About 16 months ago our insurance company paid the bills associated with a trip to the emergency room. About two weeks ago we received a notification that one item had been “reviewed,” along with a bill for $50.

My wife called the insurance company to express her feelings on this and the customer service rep said “oh, you don’t have to pay that. They’re just sent out because a lot of people will pay without asking any questions. I’ve removed the charge.”

I’m still trying to decide whether the practice or the honesty was more of a surprise.

Consumerist says:


Thinking about it, these scams sound like a very good idea to me.

I mean, let’s face it, *EVERYONE* does it as you well know. Therefore, it’s good that they feel the pain of their illegal and harmful activities. It doesn’t really matter who they pay, as long as they pay – the more heavily the better.

Also, this process should be much more efficient than the legal hoops that Big Media must go through. And if someone gets hit by a scammer and a legitimate letter? Well so much the better! Remember, you can never pay too much for your illegal activity.

Think about it carefully people and you will slowly but surely come to realise that I’m absolutely right.


MrBoJingles says:

Response to Consumerist

Clearly we know which side of the field you stand on. What you brand as illegal and harmful activities is actually, in some instances, legal and promotes the expansion of intellectual knowledge. We will see a shift from big industry into the smaller man thereby bypassing the large third-party. So they won’t have to worry about this sort of thing anymore.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...