Allman Brothers Sue Yet Another Record Label Over iTunes Royalties

from the all-for-the-artists dept

Reuters is running an article about how the Allman Brothers Band is suing Universal Music for apparently not paying the band royalties owed for iTunes downloads. This seemed like yet another example of a record label squeezing its artists, while insisting that it’s always looking out for the artists’ best interests. Of course, then I remembered that this isn’t the first time this has come up with the Allman Brothers. More than two years ago, we wrote about the Allmans suing Sony over the same issue. At that time, there was a dispute over how the label was counting iTunes downloads, and which clause iTunes downloads fit under in the band’s contract. This recent lawsuit seems like a similar dispute with Universal, but it does make you wonder why the band sued Sony back in 2006, but waited until now to sue Universal?

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: universal music

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Allman Brothers Sue Yet Another Record Label Over iTunes Royalties”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Yeah, we should definitely boycott all musicians who try to use the legal system to protect their legal rights, as well as anyone that places making a living above entertaining others.

Luckily for me, I spend my days just trying to make people happy at all costs, even when they walk all over me.

Jimmy says:

Re: Re:

“*added to list of boycotted musicians”

Wait, what? I have the opposite reaction. These guys are not suing iTunes or their listeners: they are suing the sleazy labels who claim to are trying to con the artist out of what money they can. I am 100% behind any band that wants to sue their label for skimping on royalties, and I believe that those who are anti-RIAA and such should feel the same. I can’t help but think you hopefully just misread the article?

mikelist (profile) says:

Re: Re: allman bros and others

oddly, the **aas claim that downloads cheat their clients, those being the artists, yet when they figure out how to provide downloads, they claim the artists shouldn’t benefit from them.

they aren’t pirates, they’re organized criminals, and should be prosecuted under rico, not sued by individual artists.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: allman bros and others

Pirates VS MAFIAA! (coming live to Pay-Per-View!)

An all-out, balls-to-the-wall deathmatch! Let the subpoenas fly, let the judges be bribed, threatened or coerced! It’ll be the end-all, be-all of mortal combat! Come watch to gore of live deadly combat!!

[May not be available in your or, or at all]

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re:

That should have said “added to the list of sleazy labels I’ll boycott”, right?

if not, take a deep breath and think about what’s happening here. this isn’t the abuse of the legal system against music fans (as Sony and Universal have been doing). This is a band who have a contract with these record labels, have gotten screwed over and are suing for the money they’re due.

To put it another way, you know when the RIAA say they’re suing people “for the artists”? Well, they’re not even paying the artists themselves! Why would you be boycotting the artist for this?

John Wilson says:

Re: Re: You only see 5% of the problems

It’s not even the terrible lawyer the artist may or may not have. It’s just that pretty much every artist would be suing over every release.

Hollywood taught the RIAA a thing or to about “creative” accounting and some of these cases take years to settle.

Anyway, if you’re an unknown band that plays a few bars and a few neighbourhood garages you’re probably likely to sign on the dotted line in the distant hope of something better.



Anonymous Coward says:

What are you people talking about?

Why would anyone boycott a musician for suing his record company (unless you really love record companies or something)? I dont understand, what offense have these guys commited again, except wanting to get thier share of money a record company already collected, supposedly for them. Seriously people . . . read . . .

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

A boycott over this particular issue would be doubly stupid as they are suing their own record company who collected money in their name and never actually paid them. They are not going after anyone for downloading their music, free or otherwise. Also the Allman Brothers, much like the Greatful Dead, would be the last people to get up in arms about freely distributed music as they only really achieved success after years and years of playing basically for free (they would have given up long before they achieved any success if fame and fortune were the ultimate goal). These guys are real musicians, who love to play music and I seriously doubt any of them are kept up at night worrying about getting the .001% they are due from every bootleg “Melissa” download out there. However, when a record company does collect that .001%, the brothers want their cut . . . as they should!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...