'Laboratories Of Democracy' At Work On E-voting

from the paper-ballots dept

Last summer, Congress debated legislation that would have required a voter-verified paper trail on all e-voting machines. I supported the legislation and co-authored an op-ed saying so. That legislation didn’t pass, but Joe Hall points out that Iowa is the latest state to switch back to paper ballots in its election system. He points out that thirty states now have rules requiring a voter-verified paper trail, with another 8 states using voter-verified paper trails without a specific state law requiring that they do so. Iowa looks to be even better than some of these other states because it’s moving to an almost entirely paper-based voting system. Voting machines will only be used to help voters (especially disabled voters) mark their ballots. This approach is ideal because it ensures that the paper trail won’t become an afterthought, as it often does when the “paper trail” is a roll of cash register tape that no one ever looks at.

Thanks to the hard work of voting activists, it appears that state legislatures are doing the job at the state level that Congress couldn’t get done last year. In some ways, this is actually a better way of doing things. Last year’s debate in Congress was very helpful in raising the profile of the issue, but even most supporters of last year’s legislation recognized that some states wouldn’t be able to revamp their election processes in time for the 2008 elections. More importantly, if Congress screws up — as it did when it pushed e-voting on the states with the 2002 Help America Vote Act — it’s much harder to recover than if an individual state screws up. With 50 state legislatures looking at these issues independently, states can try a variety of different approaches tailored to the needs of their individual election systems and adopt the ones that prove most successful. The momentum for verifiable elections continues to grow; hopefully the 12 states that are still conducting elections without a paper trail will get on board in time for the 2010 elections.

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “'Laboratories Of Democracy' At Work On E-voting”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

I'd sue, but I'm not a patent troll type

“Voting machines will only be used to help voters (especially disabled voters) mark their ballots.”

Had that idea from the outset of all the e-voting problems, took about 5 seconds to make. The jackass side of me says I should have patented the process and made a fortune screwing everyone.

Still, glad I didn’t. Now if only we can get the other 18 states to play by the same rules . . .

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...