Questions Raised Over Phorm's Legality As BT Admits It Tested The Service Secretly

from the transparency,-transparency,-tranparency dept

While Phorm has gone on a charm offensive to try to convince people that its efforts are not as bad as some are making them out to be (including, by the way, using my post as a de facto forum), it appears that the effort still isn’t convincing skeptics. Tim Berners-Lee made some news last week for suggesting he would switch ISPs if his started using a service like Phorm, but the bigger backlash may be coming from the legal arena. First, there was the news that BT (who had originally denied this) tested Phorm’s technology, without letting users know, last summer. That has resulted in some people threatening a lawsuit. And, speaking of lawsuits, a bunch of scholars and think tankers are pointing out that Phorm may actually be illegal based on current UK laws, if it’s used without first getting users to “opt-in.”

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: bt, phorm

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Questions Raised Over Phorm's Legality As BT Admits It Tested The Service Secretly”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
6 Comments
Nismoto says:

We don't need no stinkin ads...

Why is it that we (internet users) seem complacent in letting businesses tell us that we want more relevant advertising?

Just for the record, I DON’T WANT ANY ADVERTISING!!!!!

I use the internet to educate myself, keep in touch with friends and loved ones, work, share my interests and masturbate.

I also shop online but far less than I do the other things mentioned above. I don’t need a bunch of stiffs telling me want I am interested in or what I want.

FUCK ADVERTISING AND THE MINDLESS SHEEP THAT NEED IT!! Google text ads are just as bad as the images-that-look-like-Windows-forms-so-you’ll-click-on-them and, yes, ad-revenue business plans are wack.

Phorm Comms says:

Just one legal (untested) view

Hi Phorm Comms Team here

We don’t agree with FIPR’s analysis. And its description of the Phorm system is inaccurate. Our technology complies with the Data Protection Act, RIPA and other applicable UK laws. We’ve sought our own legal opinions as well as consulted widely with experts such as Ernst & Young, 80/20 Strategic Thinking, the Home Office, Ofcom and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We discussed our system with the ICO prior to launching it and continue to be in dialogue with the organisation.

There’s loads more information on http://www.webwise.com and you can put your questions directly to our CEO in a live webchat on Thursday (20 March) at 1.30pm – the URL is http://www.webwise.com/chat

tony says:

Re: Just one legal (untested) view

hi comms team

Just a point for you to remember.

Telling the same lie over and over again, does not make it true

The the Home Office advice was not legal opinion, it was advice from civel servents. Thy have been know to be wrong in the past.

20/80 thinking, well we all know you lied about that one… PI anyone.

Ernst & Young, not it people or legal people. did teh assesment under American, not UK law.

The ICO.. Only recieved paers a few weeks ago you you can not have been in talks with them.

I could go on, but the spin is making me dizzy

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »