The Hijacking Of An Open Source P2P App

from the scammy dept

TorrentFreak has been following the ongoing alleged hijacking of an open source file sharing system called Shareaza. Late in December, somehow a New York-based company (Discordia Ltd.) gained control of the domain name and put up a new site, though using much of the artwork from the original Shareaza site. Rather than offering up the open source Shareaza software, the new site started offering a subscription service that included adware. To add insult to injury, Discordia has also threatened the real Shareaza developers due to comments in a forum about what to do about the hijackers. The latest news is that Discorida (which TorrentFreak claims has connections to the recording industry) is trying to trademark the Shareaza name, which you would think shouldn’t be possible, given that the open source developers were working on the project for a few years before Discordia got access to the domain name. The whole thing sounds like quite a mess in a way that’s designed to likely trick users and/or discredit the open source Shareaza project.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: discordia, shareaza

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “The Hijacking Of An Open Source P2P App”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Le Blue Dude says:

.... Wow...

Seriously, why the heck are Discordia doing something so stupid? I mean that’s just about a surefire way to cheese the entire internet off at you, and then some. And since they seem to be involved in a internet app…

Well, I predict DOS, Malicious hacking, and all sorts of bad-crap happening to Discordia, followed by bankruptcy. I mean, that’s almost inevitable. And no, I’m not threatening them: I don’t even know enough to script kitty.

Quantity Surveyor Man says:

Re: .... Wow...

>Well, I predict DOS, Malicious hacking, and all sorts of bad-crap happening to Discordia, followed by bankruptcy. I mean, that’s almost inevitable. And no, I’m not threatening them: I don’t even know enough to script kitty.

Amen bro. I wonder how long they have to live? Even if they don’t get hacked down to their neurons, they’ll be listed in malware guides everywhere in just days.

Xanius says:

Why the delay in posting?

It’s not really a somehow, in the article it says that the guy that owned the domain can neither confirm nor deny that he sold it to the company. That means he most likely did because if he hadn’t then he would say “No, I did not sell them the domain and have no idea how they got it”.

Also, the trademark link points to the wrong link it should be

Anonymous Coward says:

There is more

Until recently the Shareazza application (the real one) checked the domain that Discordia purchased for updates. The authors never got around to changing it (as far as I know, most people used source forge to get the program and all the talk was going on there anyways).

Oh and that talk on the forums was not posted by a developer (at least official developer) and while the effect is akin to something illegal (DDOS) it really isn’t.

The suggestion was to make the app “call home” and use the original setting for updates (eg the domain Discordia owns now). In effect it would be a DDOS attack but the funny thing is many programs do this already!

SteveD says:

Re: linuxamp

You need money to enforce laws or make legal challenges, and the hobbyests who work on the software don’t have the finances to take this lot to court.

The conspiracy theorists claim Discordia is a shell company of some anti-piracy group or at least receiving funding and pointers from them. On the other hand maybe they’re just trying to cash in on the filesharing networks. But as Shareaza is normally used for music sharing, how would a company registered in the US manage to make money off it and keep off the RIAAs radar at the same time?

Its all a bit fishy.

Dean Landolt (profile) says:

F**k it...

Fork it and rebrand. It shouldn’t be hard if they already have a decent community, and it would be a very *Streisand* way to build that community further. Make a stink about your plight, do a name/logo competition and drum up as much chatter as possible…

It seems to be working for, who just got a c&d from, of all people, Red Hat re: their logo vs. fedora’s. It’s all quite a mess (the only thing they have in common is the symbol for infinity), but the dataportability group decided it would be more advantageous to turn this into a positive rather than waste resources pissing in the wind.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...