Facebook Settles Text Messaging Suit Even If It Probably Didn't Need To

from the less-of-a-hassle dept

Back in October we pointed to a totally pointless lawsuit against Facebook from a woman who blamed the company because her mobile phone was getting text messages from Facebook against her wishes. The problem with the lawsuit, however, was that it wasn’t Facebook’s fault, as the reason the woman was getting the errant text messages was because she had received a new phone number. The previous owner of the number had signed up to receive the text messages, and they carried over to the new subscriber. There’s no doubt that this could be quite annoying and upsetting to the woman, but it’s hard to see how Facebook really should have known about it or could be seen as the party liable here — so it appeared to be yet another lawsuit where someone targets a hot company just because it’s a hot company. In this case, though, it appears to have worked. Facebook has agreed to settle the lawsuit and pay the legal fees of the plaintiff, while also agreeing to make it easier to stop such text messages and working with mobile operators to learn about recycled numbers. While Facebook probably had a decent chance of winning the case, from a PR/user relations standpoint it probably made sense to settle and do everything possible to make this less of a problem.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: facebook

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Facebook Settles Text Messaging Suit Even If It Probably Didn't Need To”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Iron Chef says:

Not Facebook's Fault..

Honestly, I don’t know what to think about this. It’s nice that it was settled, but on the other hand, it seems maybe it was outside of Facebook’s control.

Obviously, the new person didn’t know about the 90 day standard before re-assigning a new number, or maybe this requirement was limited to only a few companies.

Or possibly, Facebook didn’t know about the 90 day FCC requirement.

Iron Chef says:

Re: Re: Not Facebook's Fault..

I’ve gotten calls from people who have gotten one of my old phone numbers complaining about the amount of junk calls they were getting in my name. This was several years after moving on from that number.

I hate this too. So how do we deal with this? There’s a 90 day FCC restriction on reassigning numbers. It’s quite annoying that telemarkerters don’t follow these rules.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Not Facebook's Fault..

It has nothing to do with telemarketers not following any rules. When a number is issued, and the subscriber hands out that number, or signs up for premium services (like joke of the day or whatever), those services continue even when the number is being held for reassignment. So, when the number gets turned back on, the service, which never stopped sending, now gets delivered.

With 99% of these services, if you text “unsubsribe” or “stop” or something like that back to the message and you will be removed from the service. I guess it was easier for this person to sue than to send a text message.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...