Apple's Conquest Of Mobile Browsing Continues With Google Phone Platform

from the open-source-browser dept

Google's GPhone (non-)announcement wasn't a big surprise, but some of the tidbits that are now emerging about the Android mobile OS are intriguing. For example, in a new video, Google's Steve Horowitz mentions that the default Android web browser will be based on Webkit, which he says is "the industry standard these days." Webkit is the open source package of web browser libraries that's at the heart of Apple's Safari web browser, and was originally based on the Linux Konquerer browser. Nokia gave the libraries a big boost last year when it announced a WebKit-based browser for its own mobile phones. And this year, Apple used WebKit as the foundation for the iPhone's web browser. The Google announcement further consolidates WebKit's status as a leading platform for mobile web browsers. The choice of WebKit for mobile browsing makes sense. Mobile browsers need to be fast and have a small footprint, and Apple originally chose the Konquerer codebase because it found it to be much leaner than Mozilla's codebase. The growing popularity of WebKit is good news for Mac Safari users (like me), who are less likely to see those annoying "your browser is not supported" messages when they visit websites. It's also good for the broader web-browsing public, as it represents the rise of a third major competitor in the browser market. As WebKit continues to grow in popularity, it will make more sense for website developers to focus on conforming to standards rather than customizing a site to the quirks of a particular browser. That, in turn, will force Microsoft (and Mozilla, but mostly Microsoft) to focus on conforming to the standards themselves, contributing to a virtuous circle of standards compliance that ultimately makes everyone's lives easier.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: apple, google

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Apple's Conquest Of Mobile Browsing Continues With Google Phone Platform”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Standard based browsers are asking for problems..

Just think, if every browser conformed to standars, what the hell would be the difference between one browser and the next? They would all be the same and then the competition would be who allows the most fluff.

Every automobile sold in the US must meet minimum standards, yet the differences between them go beyond “fluff”.


Hairball treatments.

T.J. says:

Re: Re: Re:

Yeah, but every car sold meets the minimum standards. Internet Explorer, in no way, meets any standards. Any web developer can tell you about all the headaches caused by trying to get a website or web-app to work properly in IE. There is plenty of room for individuality above the standards, but supporting web-standards should be a minimum at least.

General Eskimo says:

Re: Re:

Err, I am hoping that was sarcasm. I really am. Standards are what allow the keyboard you type on to communicate with your motherboard model, because otherwise an intel 975X mobo would require an intel 975X keyboard!

He was speaking about their “core”, because this is what allows you to view web pages which were not explicitly written for your browser. Imagine being a web programmer and having to write separate HTML for 20 different common web browsers? Standards give a unified foundation so that actual progress can be made, instead of a 10-year battle over how to impliment technology which was old news a decade ago.

Hell, why don’t we do away with all standards! SCREW OPERATING SYSTEMS, with their attempt to allow programs to run the same on different configurations. Screw OpenGL and Direct3D, whose main use is to provide a standard to allow 3D graphics to run across different hardware platforms! All programs should just be written separately for every platform, because it promotes COMPETITION BASED ON FEATURES!

So, when you go and buy some Spreadsheet program, instead of having a Mac and PC version, you’ll have the:
Intel x86
-Cedar Mill
Intel x86-64
AMD 32-bit
AMD 64
…etc etc…

Wow! There could be hundreds of independent versions of the same core application. And the best part is, since they would most likely be forced to be developed somewhat independently (independent of standards), NONE OF THE FILES WOULD WORK ON THE OTHER PLATFORMS!

Hell, everyone could design their own file-system too! Or if you want to make images in your app, MAKE YOUR OWN IMAGE FORMAT, because otherwise all products would be the same. Reinvent the wheel every time, just for the sake of being different. I know that is the type of mentality that OOP is all about! (If you missed that reference, then wiki it)


Your right, this DOES sound like a better world!

(BTW- If you are being sarcastic, then this is directed at anyone who was inadvertently agreeing with your stated opinion)

Haywood Jablowme says:

umm you don't know what you are talking about....

Hahahaha I needed that, thanks! I’ve had a rough day and I needed a good clownpost to lift my spirits.

Standards Compliance has little or nothing to do with how useful a browser is, how the bookmarks/favorites are arranged, whether it has tabbed browsing or not, what it’s security is like, what addons it supports, etc…

If all browsers magically became 100% compliant to all relevant standars the majority of users wouldn’t even notice on the majority of popular sites. But web developers sure would notice, and they would kneel down and give thanks to whatever entity performed such a miracle!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: umm you don't know what you are talking about.

Hahahaha I needed that, thanks! I’ve had a rough day and I needed a good clownpost to lift my spirits.

Standards Compliance has little or nothing to do with how useful a browser is,

Yeah right. Try using a totally non-compliant browser that won’t read any websites and tell me how useful it is. Talk about “clownposts”.

Shun says:

Open Standards

Regardless of how things have been done in the past, the mobile phone / smart phone platform is a place where we can have open standards, and pretty much enforce them. The reason why M$ can get away with breaking web pages is because they dominate the desktop, and IE is a de-facto standard.

Conversely, there is no standard in the mobile phone world. We have M$, Apple, OpenMoko, Symbian. It’s kind of a wild west, at the moment. Google is just trying to capitalize on that, and give developers a chance to code for an “open” standard.

I like to go on the “just think if M$ or Apple controlled…” types of rants. I’ll give you an example. What if one company controlled IEEE 802.11b. Just stacked that body with a bunch of corporate shills. Wouldn’t that be a nightmare. “This router only works with genuine Microsoft parts” or “Will only work with Airport”.

So, I tend to believe that open, transparent standards are good. Now, the fact that Google still decides what ultimately stays in the code is a bit problematic…but, oh well. I’ll fight that battle another day, once Sauron is neutralized.

Dolores Wheatly (user link) says:


Innofest 2007

Innominds is planning to organize its 2nd Annual Convention and Customer meet (InnoFest 2007) in Santa Clara, CA on Friday, November 16th, 2007.

The common theme of Innofest2007 is “Defining business models and partnership objectives to gear up global growth strategies for the participants in the IT ecosystem”. During the Convention Party they plan on identifying and debating fundamental issues that will shape the future of innovation and software product development in the lines of the common theme.

Innofest2007 will be attended by Innominds’ ISV customers, business partners, prospect ISVs, VCs and industry analysts. The event provides a platform that would enable the players of this ecosystem to interact. It will be an opportunity for you to meet your peer community and learn from their business practices, potential partners, funding houses who may be interested in your products and analysts who may want to write about you in their features.

Brad says:

WebKit != Apple

Okay, I’m sick of “analysts” that claim to be “informed” giving massive praise to Apple for taking a well documented and widely developed opensource project and slapping it on another platform. Apple didn’t re-invent the browser. Apple didn’t revolutionize the mobile internet. APPLE IS NOT CONQUERING THE MOBILE WEB! THE STUCK AN OPENSOURCE BROWSER ON THEIR CELLPHONE, SO THEY WOULDN’T HAVE TO WRITE AS MUCH CODE.

In fact, almost all the “fancy” features you see in the iPhone browser (full-page view and spot zooming, for example) were available in the 2006 public beta of Microsoft’s Deepfish browser.

Get up off your knees in the Apple office. Claiming WebKit is somehow “Apple’s” is disrespectful to all the thousands of opensource hours that went into it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...