Congress Not At All Pleased With Yahoo's Explanation In Chinese Dissident Case

from the let's-start-from-the-top dept

After claiming last week that he was merely uninformed rather than intentionally misleading when he told Congress that Yahoo had no info into the investigation of a pro-democracy dissident jailed by the Chinese government, Yahoo general counsel Michael Callahan was berated by Congressional representatives who claim they don’t buy his story. However, in his defense, no one in Congress seems to have explained what Callahan could have done differently, other than reveal the info he knew when he got it. As distasteful as it is that Yahoo may have had a hand in turning over info to the Chinese government, it still feels like the Congressional hearings are mere grandstanding efforts by a Congress who is unlikely to do anything about this issue. Still, the end result may be a good thing: American companies may at least start to think twice before freely aiding the Chinese government in oppressing its own people.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: yahoo

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Congress Not At All Pleased With Yahoo's Explanation In Chinese Dissident Case”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
11 Comments
Mike (profile) says:

Re: Re:

If you really buy the story that Callahan was uninformed how can you conclude “American companies may at least start to think twice before…” why would they think twice about stuff they don’t know ?.

Callahan = 1 person at the company who could be uninformed of what was happening halfway around the world.

Company = made up of many people, who will now be aware of the overall impact this is having on the company. Those people will now think twice.

Better?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Get real Mike.
“American companies” exist to gain power and make money and Americans are generally proud of how ruthlessly we pursue that goal.

Most American cmpanies have incentive schemes to promote that.
Most American companies do not have incentives to protect the human rights of anyone – not even Americans – nor are employees incentivised to prevent ignorant executives telling crap to congress.

Obviously if no penalty is imposed on Yahoo then behavior will not change.

If they get a slap on the wrist them it’s theoretically possible that employee’s might send the exec’ more email so he’s not so ignorant … but don’t count on it !.

Anonymous Coward says:

Yahoo China...Not really Yahoo

From reading the other stories posted about this issue, it was Yahoo China, which is run by Alibaba.com. Yahoo, Inc is merely a small investor in Alibaba.com. Yahoo does get the perks from Yahoo China of having the mail servers, which are located in China. It is very possible the General Counsel for Yahoo was not fully informed because Alibaba.com could have taken care of it.

Also, just like U.S. Companies have to follow U.S. law and regulations regarding handing over information from a legal process, a company also has to follow other countries laws for the same in the country in which it operates. Thus, servers in China, being run by Chinese company, means they have to follow Chinese law. This is just the same as Google, Yahoo, AOL, and MSN all handing over search information to the U.S. Govt when required.

Congress is acting very wrongly in this case and the language they are using is despicable. Just like with most things, Congress needs to know when it can and can’t do something as well as when it should and shouldn’t do something.

slimcat (profile) says:

Congressional Effrontery

I think they have a lot of gall coming down on Yahoo. Where the hell were they when we lost the right to habeas corpus guaranteed by the Constitution (if you think this does not apply to US citizens, you are pathetically misinformed), when the administration skirted other constitutional law or when little George started an illegal war, also a constitutional violation?

Investigating government oppression starts at home. China can wait. Just my two cents worth.

Anonymous Coward says:

When the US Gov’t asked the phone companies to provide information – without the necessary warrants – they all complied except Qwest.

Where is Congress on this issue? We know that Bush is demanding immunity against prosecution and lawsuits for them. Nice deal! The head crook demands immunity for his accomplices – and he’ll get it.

We can’t do much about China’s leaders; but Bush should be impeached.

By the way, for obeying the law, Qwest lost very lucrative government contracts. Why did we allow this bunch of thugs to run our country (into the ground)?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...