Mary Meeker's YouTube Math Misses The Mark

from the back-in-the-news-together dept

YouTube’s new ad overlays continue to engender a lot of discussion about their potential impact on the online video market. One person who is quite optimistic about the program is the infamous (but still employed at Morgan Stanley) Mary Meeker, who estimated that the new system would add a staggering $4.8 billion to Google’s top line. But, as none other than Henry Blodget points out, there’s a little problem with Meeker’s analysis (via Valleywag). She mistakenly took CPM to mean ‘cost per impression’ rather than ‘cost per thousand’, meaning that her estimate was off by a factor of 1,000. In other words, by her own logic, the new ad system will contribute lead to a modest $4.8 million revenue bump, which is nothing compared to the $1.65 billion Google paid for the site. Meeker has been covering this space for a long time, so it’s hard to imagine that she really didn’t know what CPM meant. Perhaps she was just trying to rush out a quick report on the topic and didn’t take the time to look it over. But you’d still think that such a huge figure would give her some pause and make her question some assumptions before coming out with such a bold pronouncement.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: google, youtube

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Mary Meeker's YouTube Math Misses The Mark”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
RandomThoughts (user link) says:

new ad system will contribute lead to a modest $4.8 million revenue bump, which is nothing compared to the $1.65 billion Google paid for the site.

Huh? Am I missing something here? Pay $1.65 billion, revenue growth of $4.8 billion? Sounds ok to me. Would imagine the $4.8 billion is per year. Top line is revenue growth. Maybe she said $4.8 billion bottom line?

Ajax 4Hire (profile) says:

She is not an engineer,

an engineer faced with numbers that do not seem to make sense knows to run the numbers again.

The numbers have to make sense and if they do not make sense then you need to go back to the math and understand. Then the numbers will make sense.

If you see an engineer give you an answer and then scratch their head, rub their chin or scrunch their face, then don’t believe the answer. It is just a guess.

More fun with engineers: get one to say never/always or it is impossible.
They are trained to think that nothing is impossible, it only takes enough research/development and money.

Overcast says:

Yeah, but you know – it’s kinda meaningless.

How many times do you see a Burger King commercial and end up at Taco Bell? *thinking, oh ya, fast food sounds good* – which one is almost irrelevant. There’s a couple of fast food places near me I won’t go to, I don’t care how many commercials I see – because, they quality sucks – BAD.

It’s funny how some places will just dump millions into ads and then pay their employees like crap – and when you pay like crap, what kind of job is going to get done? Well – ya’ know, you get what you pay for.

Which is just why I don’t buy half of the products out there – they are garbage.

Take Mattel for instance – there’s absolutely no way I’ll buy my nieces or nephews a toy from them. Sorry, no ‘savings’ can possibly offset the risk of contamination or poisoning from their inept manufacturing. Just stating a fact. I think I’ll look more for domestic products now in general.

Ads, ads, ads… I still ignore them, even if I see them. Quality is why I shop where I do. Not ads.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...