New York Governor Finds Himself In An Unfamiliar Position

from the turning-the-tables dept

During his tenure as New York Attorney General, Eliot Spitzer aggressively used his office to go after a range of industries that he deemed to be operating illegally or unethically. Wall Street firms were a favorite target of his, while others included the music and spyware industries. Of course , one sector that has historically trumped all others in terms of corruption and betrayal of the public trust is Spitzer’s own, the public sector. Over the past week, his office has been engulfed in a major scandal, whereby it’s been revealed that his operatives used state resources to go after Spitzer’s political opponents. Like so many executives that have been dragged in front of a jury in recent years, Spitzer claims to have been ignorant of his underlings’ activities. But this excuse has never gone over very well in court, and in fact a law was passed (Sarbanes-Oxley), designed specifically to upend this potential defense. It sort of makes you wonder whether we need a similar law for politicians, whereby every quarter they must declare full responsibility for the actions of their aides. It’s a nice idea, but since it would require politicians to pass such a law, it’s never going to happen.

Filed Under:

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “New York Governor Finds Himself In An Unfamiliar Position”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Mystified says:

Re: Re:

Overcast is right – too many laws. It’s a shame every little action has to have a law regarding it. If only people could understand right and wrong and always do the right thing.

We would need far fewer laws if we could say “X is illegal” instead of of “X is illegal in situation A” in one law and then have to add 13 more laws stating “X is illegal in situation B ( C, D, E, F, …)”

For example – Driving while distracted is illegal. It doesn’t matter if the distraction is a cell phone, your make-up or your breakfast. One law should cover it, not three.

Sanguine Dream says:


I’d be all for that except for the fact that if such a law were passed it would become too easy for candidate A to pay one of candidate B’s underlings to intentionally do something scandalous to make B look bad. And we all know that the real victims of this would be the precious few honest politicians that are left

Thomas says:


The problem with “everyone knowing right and wrong” is that everyone has a different idea of what right and wrong are. Take any hot issue such as abortion. Whats right and whats wrong? Not so clear (maybe to some individuals but as a holistic society we’re split). There aren’t any honest politicians left. Its just rich(read powerful) people going through the motions of pretending to care so they can get elected and make themselves richer. Wake up, its a giant club and you’re not a member.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...