How Does Paying Some Lawyers $4 Million Help With Consumer Privacy?

from the good-work-if-you-can-get-it dept

We noted earlier in the week that the number of shareholder class-action lawsuits is falling. For average-Joe stockholders, this really means very little, as the settlements they receive from such suits are often pretty minimal. The lawyers that seek out and file these suits are the ones feeling the pinch, since they’re the real beneficiaries of class-action suits. But even though shareholder suits are becoming less popular, lawyers still have plenty of other kinds of class-action suits to generate some cash. Case in point: a recent settlement (via Threat Level) of a suit against Bank of America, in which it was alleged the company made customers’ personal information available to outside marketers and other third parties, in violation of its privacy policies. The effected class is pretty huge, with 35 million current and former customers available for a piece of the “$14 million settlement.” Of course, that $14 million figure is pretty theoretical. It includes a $3.25 million contribution to “privacy-related programs”, while people in the class are (depending on where they live and what accounts they had with the bank) eligible for a $200 discount on mortgage loan origination fees at BoA, some free checking account services, 90 days of “Identity Theft Protection Service”, or a year of some other pointless credit-card “security” program. What do the lawyers get? Bank of America’s agreed to pay them up to $4 million. Why don’t they just cut out all the trouble, just pay the lawyers $4 million upfront, and promise they’ll never do it again? Seems like that would deliver roughly the same end benefits.

Filed Under: ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “How Does Paying Some Lawyers $4 Million Help With Consumer Privacy?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Derek Kerton (profile) says:

No Way!

No Way, Carlo! I suggest they pay the lawyers up front, sure, but *they* get paid in rebates on mortgage initiation fees, coupons for free toasters if they open an account, reduced checking fees for 6 months, and the first 3 months free of a credit monitoring service (credit card required, cancel anytime after 3 free months.)

Let’s just give the 4M cash to Warren Buffet or Bill and Melinda Gates. They seem to know what to do with excess money.

Sanguine Dream says:

I don't get it

Blasted fingers…

I was gonna say that I don’t get how in a lawsuit that involves about 35 million peole said 35 million people get what amounts to a few hundred but the lawyers that only got involved when the case was about to go to court and won’t think about it again (since it wasn’t their info that was comprimised) walk away with a few miilion a piece.

What has happened to this nation when lawyers are now taking the lion’s share of a settlement or lawsuit winnings? I know lawyers work hard but damn…

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...