Spamford Wallace Accused Of Spamming MySpace

from the just-can't-let-go dept

Sanford “Spamford” Wallace was the original spam king — and he was proud of the label. Back in the late 90’s he was basically the face of the first generation of spammers. After running into trouble with the law, he promised that he had reformed himself and gone into the nightclub/DJ business. However, the lure of questionable online marketing practices was apparently too much. A few years ago, it was discovered that he was in the spyware/adware business. When the FTC cracked down on him for that, he disappeared for a while before eventually being fined $4 million. You would think that after getting in trouble twice for questionable online marketing, he would have learned to stay away — but Wallace apparently just can’t let go. News Corp. is now suing Wallace for setting up 11,000 fake profiles in MySpace, and using them to redirect visitors to various marketing websites. The article isn’t entirely clear on the charges, but it includes charging Wallace with violating CAN SPAM — suggesting he was also spamming people via email to get them to visit these sites. Either way, someone might want to suggest to Wallace that he not get involved in various online marketing schemes for a while.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Spamford Wallace Accused Of Spamming MySpace”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Chris (user link) says:


the biggest problem is that MySpace lets you report spam messages, but not spam friend requests. The spammers figured that out and just started making all those fake profiles and requesting to ad everybody they could. Tom (dude who ‘runs’ MySpace) posted a bulletin the other day saying that legal action was imminent and that new controls are going to be put in place to prevent this from happening. It makes me wonder though, what’s the difference between a porno site setting up a page on MySpace to advertise and say, Transformers The Movie having their page being whored by MySpace itself? I guess U have to pay MySpace if U want to spam it’s users.

RandomThoughts (user link) says:

You are looking at this from the wrong perspective. It is all a risk/reward equation. Sure, Sanford paid his fines, but how much did he make? Think there wasn’t tons of profit there?

Think its limited to Spam? Look at the fines Wall Street pays to the SEC. Think they lose money on those? Choicepoint paid a $15 million fine, how much did they profit?

They pay million dollar fines but make billion dollar profits. I am not an accountant, but I know that works out well. Breaking the law and paying fines are a business expense. A cost of doing business. Thats the way things work.

thecaptain says:

What's the point of fines?

I’ve been digging around and I wish someone would point me to a good explanation.

What the hell is the point of fining this guy? The article says he was fined FOUR BILLION dollars. FOUR BILLION.
He was rich before, but I don’t think it was in the billions.

So if he’s bankrupt, how the hell is he still managing to create havoc like this? Where does he get the cash?

If the fine doesn’t hurt him much, what was the point in the first place?

This guy’s like the Woody Woodpecker of spam.

Rich Kulawiec says:

This is why spamming should be punishable by death

Consider how much aggregate time this scumbag has chewed up
in his “career”. Between the spam, the junk faxing, the spyware,
and everything else….he has eaten up the equivalent of many,
MANY human lifetimes. Consumed the one thing we can never
buy more of, the most precious thing we have. He’s a psychopath.

He deserves to die.

But aside from that, there are two other lessons here that those of
us who work in this area have known for years (or decades):

1. There is no such thing as an “ex-spammer”.

2. Spam is often not the worst thing they do.

Brad says:

Re: This is why spamming should be punishable by d

“He’s a psychopath.

He deserves to die.”
-Rich Kulawiec

Hey Pot, have you met Kettle?

Seriously, scamming stupid people and cluttering up the internet is a financial crime, so the response should be financial. He shouldn’t be killed for inconveniencing people. That’s just plain idiotic. Who’s the psychopath, really? You’re advocating someone be killed because you don’t like their business practices. I hope you never get into a position of authority.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...