C-SPAN Wisely Removing Restrictions On Its Content

from the transparency dept

There was a bit of a controversy last week after C-SPAN asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to remove some of the network’s footage from a committee meeting that she had posted on her site. The network has apparently revisited its stance on the issue, and will now encourage non-commercial sharing and copying of all Congressional and federal agency footage, even if it was filmed with C-SPAN’s own cameras. Apparently, the network’s move is influenced by Creative Commons licensing, although it won’t actually put such a license on its content. Unfortunately, this new policy won’t apply to its own, in-studio programming, such as its morning call-in show. It really makes sense for C-SPAN to fully embrace open distribution of its content. It’s not a commercial organization, so it shouldn’t be too concerned if viewers are watching it though unofficial channels. Furthermore, opening up helps further its goal of providing public access to the political process. Still, this is a step in the right direction, and hopefully the network will continue along further along this path.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “C-SPAN Wisely Removing Restrictions On Its Content”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Viceroy says:

Tiresome Phrases

I have been subscribed to TechDirt’s RSS feed for quite some time and have noticed an annoying trend that doesn’t make much sense. The phrases (or minor variants), “quite some time” and “doesn’t (or does) make (much) sense.”

After a few weeks of seeing these particular phrases in almost every article, I find myself not reading the articles for the value of their content, but just to amuse myself by finding the “easter eggs.”

Comon guys, can’t you get a little more creative than this?

ConceptJunkie (profile) says:

I can see why...

I can see why they maybe don’t want license all their stuff the same way: Someone will figure out a way to make money off of it.

While that doesn’t hurt C-SPAN directly, by retaining full control over their information, they can make sure people don’t go around selling it.

Of course, this is completely a guess. I think C-SPAN does a great job and I listen to them on the radion a lot. Backing down was the right thing to do, it’s nice to see an organization, even if it’s not a for-profit business, recognize that technology has changed the way we distribute media.

Now if we could only get the **AA companies to stop trying to fight the future and embrace it. All it takes is a business model that can be stated without the words “extort” or “violate” (or “screw”).

James says:

Re: It's not tax dollars

My bad, indeed you are correct… directly from the c-span website:

“C-SPAN is a private, nonprofit business created in 1979 by America’s cable television industry. Its operating funds are derived from monthly fees paid by affiliated cable TV systems and other distributors of C-SPAN programming. C-SPAN receives no funds from the government.”

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...