Viacom's Deal With Joost Really Just A Bargaining Chip With YouTube?

from the Viacom-raises-the-stakes dept

Viacom is getting plenty of attention this morning for signing a deal to distribute some of its content via Joost, the tremendously hyped up peer-to-peer video streaming service created by the founders of Kazaa and Skype. Of course, given the recent decision by Viacom to demand its clips be taken off YouTube, almost every article is suggesting that Viacom did so in order to move forward with Joost. Except that Joost is different than YouTube. It’s more about providing a television-like experience to viewing content, but doesn’t (yet) have much of the community aspect of YouTube. Also, considering that Joost is still in private beta, it’s hardly clear whether or not Joost will bring the large numbers of viewers that YouTube automatically did. About the only thing that the deal with Joost is good for right now is for Viacom to go back to the folks at Google/YouTube and say “look, Joost is willing to pay us money!” in the hopes that it will convince YouTube to pay out as well.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Viacom's Deal With Joost Really Just A Bargaining Chip With YouTube?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
ScaredOfTheMan says:

Not really…..

I checked out the viacom official clips… the difference is what is made available and how its presented.

Someone at comedy central decides what part of the show will make the clips. The Youtube (user generated versions) are usually more to my liking.

I could care less that its gootube or whoever, my point is that user posted clips are almost always better than the shiny hand selected corp ones.

I mean seriously someone is going through all that trouble to capture (maybe edit) and upload that video…for free!

Sanguine Dream says:

As long

as the clips aren’t altered I don’t see the problem.

I start up a funny and successfull show and then months later people all over the net are posting fan made clips of my show.

That is called word of mouth advertising. I don’t have to spend as much on marketing because the fans are doing some of the work for me. As long as they acknowledge that the clips are from my show and they dont alter them then I don’t see the problem.

Oh yes I do. The corporate mentality is to control everything and get as much money as possible now at the price of the long term.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...