My Phone's Not Set To Silent, It's Set To Art

from the pretentious dept

If you weren’t already tired of ringtones, this might push you over the edge: an artist has created a ringtone containing four minutes and thirty-three seconds of silence to give people a “respite” or serve some other sufficiently artsy purpose. What the guy’s really done is rip-off John Cage’s 1952 song 4’33”, which contained — yes, you guessed it — four minutes and thirty-three seconds of silence. The ringtone artist prefers to use the terms “revisit,” “remix” and “remaster”, asserting that his digitally produced silence is better than Cage’s analog version. Apart from fulfilling the usual stereotypes about conceptual artists, the guy’s also inviting a lawsuit, since Cage’s publishers tend to think they own the idea of silent songs. Perhaps the real irony here is that the artist doesn’t even own a cell phone. If he did, maybe he’d realize that they all pretty much feature a silent mode these days.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “My Phone's Not Set To Silent, It's Set To Art”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
44 Comments
misanthropic humanist says:

“the guy’s also inviting a lawsuit, since Cage’s publishers tend to think they own the idea of silent songs.”

I’d love to see that conflict go to court. Cage “recorded” 433 on tape and released it on vinyl. That means the “mechanical” would in fact be noise. The remixers assertion would indeed hold up to spectrographic analysis (admissable in music disputes). Not only is it a different product, it is also a “better” version.

Then to add insanity to absurdity, I’d like to see them thrash it out over the score.

Hear that second refrain your honour? Where the unpiano completely fails to harmonise with the total lack of strings? I wrote that bit. Er, I mean I didn’t write it… no wait a minute..

Please, please, please let them sue, we need more entertainment of this kind.

btw, Alex, what do you think of this modern interpretation of a classic concept?

Bob says:

Free

The summary didn’t mention that this ringtone is free. Thankfully no one was foolish enough to actually charge for it, and at the same time it’s also called “My Cage”. I wonder if this would hold up at all in court, being as how it’s a tribue and/or parody plus the lack of profit being made. Things sure will be interesting… but I’m sure all we’ll hear about it now is silence.

Hulser says:

Ringtones are rude

Ah, finally an exception to my personal rule that all ringtones are rude. No, I don’t want to hear a few seconds of your new favorite song. I don’t want to hear a few seconds of some classic pop song, some jingle, or some other bothersome noise. Just put your damn phone on vibrate and keep your noise to yourself.

Never would I have predicted that companies would make millions of dollars by enabling people to more easilly annoy their fellow humans. If you want to express yourself, wear a funny t-shirt, color your hair purple, or pierce something. At least those don’t assault our ears. Oh, and get the hell off my lawn!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Ringtones are rude

EXACTLY! Where the hell are the good old fashioned “ring ring” tones? All I can find is the digitized crap variations like “Trash Can” or “Metal Bells.” I just want to know my phone is ringing, not listen to the latest song they have for the phone. By the way, did I mention I just want a phone? I have this thing called a camera, I don’t want to pay extra to have a crap one in my phone. I want my phone to make phone calls, and not cost me $100. Screw rebates too… 🙂

Bench says:

Finally

a ringtone I wouldn’t be ashamed to use.

of course, I’m partial to the piece, as (in college, of course) I conducted a performance of 4’33” arranged for Microwave Oven. The hum and beep were a bit of a departure from the original, but I think Cage’s intent was still served: how often do you as an individual listener simply sit and listen for four and a half minutes? This becomes even more fascinating when you get a large audience together and get them to sit in “silence” for a few minutes. anyway, it’s lazy to dismiss this as a piece of conceptual art “junk” in a world where silence is at such a premium.

DZmodelman says:

todd & eric got it right

i read 16 comments thinking what todd was, “how the hell would i hear a silent ringtone??!!” i wouldn’t. that’s the point. when i go into a meeting, i put my phone on vibrate if i want calls, and silent when i don’t.

when cage first introduced this piece to the public, it was about hearing the lady in the 3rd row cough, the guy next to you sniffle, and everyone else get more & more uncomfortable because THEY were now making the soundtrack to the musicians on stage resting. brilliant. the vinyl version was never as good as the live, for the reasons dicussed above – the mechanical hum and clicks of blank phonograh tracks just tells me it’s time to flip the disc.

but if i put a ‘ringtone’ on my phone, it’s so that i know when someone is trying to contact me. someone across the conference table is always sniffling or coughing, and if i checked my phone every time, my brain would explode. i can’t wait to hear more about this lawsuit.

i can’t wait until the next revolution when we kill all the lawyers…

[kossori hana.] (user link) says:

[this is the same comment i left on wired. the drug comment is for posts made there.]

a friend of mine once wrote “music is composed of sound and silence.” i believe him. this ringtone is not music, or even art. i agree that it’s a gimmick used to make a point. i dislike things of that nature.

i do however remember hearing about the john cage piece for the first time. i vividly imagined what it would have been like to be there as he composed the silence and the audience composed the sound. people rustling their programs, coughing, scratching an itch, whispering to their company about when the piece is going to start. all the while, he is sitting at the piano poised to begin playing. it would have been like the movie theater before the previews, except more hushed, expectant, and intense. i think i would have enjoyed it.

and btw, i didn’t need drugs to use my imagination.

The Lecturer says:

This guy goofed up by calling it a remix. Instead, he should have called it something completely different, and suggested that his music was merely in the same style! The difference is that Cage’s music was in 3 movements, there was a visual component (raising and lowering of the piano top) and the music was written down, so it could be performed by other, um…artists. I would argue that while the instrumentation is identical (none) there is otherwise little resemblance between the two pieces.

Both “composers” should be slapped repeatedly for this garbage, anyway…

James Touchi-Peters says:

Actually, Lecturer, as you yourself mentioned, the instrumentation is *not* identical. Cage’s piece is written for solo piano; and most importantly, it is *not* complete silence. The sheet music instructs the pianist to hold down the piano’s sustain pedal for the title’s duration. Cage’s idea was that the ambient sound in the room would cause the piano’s strings to subtly and indiscriminantly vibrate; sometimes, you can actually hear this! So ultimately, the ringtone actually has nothing to do with Cage’s composition at all.

James Touchi-Peters
Conductor Emeritus
Minnesota Philharmonic Orchestra, Minneapolis

PhysicsGuy says:

James Touchi-Peters

it’s called resonant entrainment. a string that vibrates with a specific base frequency will begin to vibrate and produce a tone when put near a sound source that shares the same base frequency. while some sound from the audience very well may produce a musical tone i’m not sure the amplitude would be enough to cause the entrainment to occur unless done in a very small room.

Cage’s idea was that the ambient sound in the room would cause the piano’s strings to subtly and indiscriminantly vibrate. So ultimately, the ringtone actually has nothing to do with Cage’s composition at all.

and your source? there are plenty of quotes and documented occasions that lead to the inspiration of this piece, however to proclaim what you do is bordering absurdity. also, have you seen the score? it consists of nothing but I, II, III (indicating the movement) and the word “Tacet” (indicating silence)… there’s no pedal indications whether by word or marking.

http://www.sheetmusicplus.com/store/smp_inside.html?cart=337716820012785999&item=1008430&page=2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:433score.jpg

so, i’m curious, where do you get the idea that there is instructions for pedal use when there is clearly none?

Rhetoric K. Snare says:

Eh, supposed to be funny, no?

First off, Good Grief! the description of the ringtone was clearly tongue in cheek (i.e, it was supposed to be, and in my opinion was, funny). And I agree with the poster who thought this was a clever take on Cage’s piece (just a quick take worth a chuckle, nothing elaborate or profound, but still funny).
We shouldn’t miss the point — yes, it does involve a cell phone ‘ring tone,’ but this would be more about everything outside the cell phone (assuming this truly is an homage) when the cell phone is silent. Etcetera — more has been pointed out by some of the people who obviously get it [kossori hana, Tomas, Bench, etc.] ; a lot of the rest of the folks need to get a sense of humor and proportion. Take a minute, take a breath, and try to hold your fire for something worthwhile. Politics, the environment, RIAA, MS Vista? Some of you act like the guy has proposed that we we replace our kitchens with magic dogshit fountains that mail money to undeserving artists.
That being said, I just looked at the artist’s site. Yeah, maybe a bit pretentious.
And, the Cage publishers suing the guy over the silent track is patently ridiculous. Really.
Cage, on the other hand, and 4’33”, I like. Maybe see (because I am too lazy) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Cage
Again, nothing terribly original here, but nothing worthy of anger either, I don’t think.

Rhetoric K. Snare says:

Eh, supposed to be funny, no?

First off, Good Grief! the description of the ringtone was clearly tongue in cheek (i.e, it was supposed to be, and in my opinion was, funny). And I agree with the poster who thought this was a clever take on Cage’s piece (just a quick take worth a chuckle, nothing elaborate or profound, but still funny).
We shouldn’t miss the point — yes, it does involve a cell phone ‘ring tone,’ but this would be more about everything outside the cell phone (assuming this truly is an homage) when the cell phone is silent. Etcetera — more has been pointed out by some of the people who obviously get it [kossori hana, Tomas, Bench, etc.] ; a lot of the rest of the folks need to get a sense of humor and proportion. Take a minute, take a breath, and try to hold your fire for something worthwhile. Politics, the environment, RIAA, MS Vista? Some of you act like the guy has proposed that we we replace our kitchens with magic dogshit fountains that mail money to undeserving artists.
That being said, I just looked at the artist’s site. Yeah, maybe a bit pretentious.
And, the Cage publishers suing the guy over the silent track is patently ridiculous. Really.
Cage, on the other hand, and 4’33”, I like. Maybe see (because I am too lazy) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Cage
Again, nothing terribly original here, but nothing worthy of anger either, I don’t think.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...