The Copyright Battle Over Bambi
from the a-true-Disney-story dept
If you’ve ever heard Larry Lessig’s stump speech on creativity and copyright, you know that it has a chunk in the middle dedicated to the fact that Disney, one of the biggest proponents of copyright extension to keep Mickey Mouse protected, has a long history of taking the ideas of others and reusing them in their own stories. In fact, the biggest irony is the fact that Disney “stole” (using their language) the very idea behind Mickey Mouse’s Steamboat Willie debut from Buster Keaton’s Steamboat Bill — which came out the same year. Plenty of other popular Disney movies all came from using content in the public domain — but not all of it. William Patry goes through the court battle from about a decade ago where questions were raised about Disney’s rights to the story of Bambi. Turns out they might not really have owned the rights to it. Patry focuses on the case and why the ruling is exceptionally bad, but even more interesting to me is the lengths Disney went to try to win the case. As Patry notes, they basically threw out every possible argument to see what stuck, including claiming that Bambi was really in the public domain and then that it wasn’t in the public domain, but that Disney owned the rights to it, rather than the heirs of the author of the story. So whenever Disney claims some moral right to keep extending copyright, it seems like the Bambi fight is worth pointing out as a counter example alongside the Steamboat Willie story.
Comments on “The Copyright Battle Over Bambi”
Factoid or article?
Just what exactly is this getting at?
lawyer double-speak
The fact that lawyers are claiming one thing, then another, then another is nothing new — even if those statements contradict one another.
It is basically throwing theories at the judge/jury (whatever the case may be) and see which one holds traction.
Every (good) lawyer does this and, in reality, is probably the least worst way to conduct law.
They do have a fancy name for this methodology — it’s called pleading in the alternative, and like I said it’s about as common in the courtroom as bullshit is.
Re: lawyer double-speak
This is one of the best synopsis of a legal system I have ever read.
Sheer genius: Copyright is good for content owners and bad for everyone else. Never would have figured that out on my own.
agree with #1
This seems less of an article and more like a factoid.
The only thing recent about this ‘article” is the blog that it was stolen from, but even the author of the blog admits he is writing about an old topic (most recent related occurrence being 1996)
Slow news day or what?
Bambi is balllin
Yoooooooooooooooooo! i am bambi and i love to be ballllin on yoo wives while u are pstin on dis shizzzz boiiii!
shanghai
How’s China printing industry developed this years, who can tell us?
China based plastic injection molding services with low costs and supeior quality
Steel and aluminum scaffolding for construction is a very useful tool.
newest jordan shoes
This was a useful post and I think it is rather easy to see from the other comments as well that this post is well written and useful