FCC Commissioner Copps Out With Broadband Strategy Suggestion

from the send-your-ideas-on-a-postcard dept

It’s been pretty clear for sometime that broadband penetration in the US isn’t nearly as high as some politicos would like you to believe, and that the fundamental problem is a lack of competition. At least one FCC commissioner, Michael Copps, realizes that, and in an op-ed in the Washington Post, slates the lack of progress (via Broadband Reports) the country has made in fostering a competitive broadband environment, expanding access and increasing the level of services available to consumers. While it’s nice to hear that maybe at least one person at the FCC has some grasp of what’s going on, the problem is that Copps doesn’t really offer any suggestions for what to do to remedy the situation, beyond saying the FCC needs to develop a “broadband strategy”. That’s pretty much the same thing he said back in February, and while he’s been busy since then dealing with things like the AT&T-BellSouth merger (in which he’s holding out for more significant concessions from the companies), it would be nice to see him make some concrete suggestions for what this strategy should be, rather than just suggesting that a strategy is needed.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FCC Commissioner Copps Out With Broadband Strategy Suggestion”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
12 Comments
ohreally says:

OK, lets hear the great ideas here. What is America to do? Should we create a tax to wire the country? Would the public accept that? Should we make Verizon and AT&T open up their networks to competitors (and see how fast FIOs and Lightspeed stop?)

What the hell would you propose? Hopefully it would be something that would not raise my taxes. I would rather pay more taxes to fix healthcare in America than be concerned about Johnny being able to play video games on the net or download porn. Oh, and make sure your proposal covers places like Montana and Wyoming, not just the big cities.

Rick says:

Re: Re:

We already have a tax – over $7 BILLION will be collected this year in Universal Service Fund fees. Everyone in America already has a phone line, so this money is supposed to be spent to upgrade the service in unprofitable areas, yet it is mainly used to fund the deep pockets of the incumbent telcos.

Hopefully the Dems will take notice and start demanding what the FCC can only keep repeating….

Karl (user link) says:

He does have a place to start...

He does suggest a place to start, and it’s reforming the FCC’s joke classification of broadband as an asynchronous 200kbps connection, as well as reforming their data collection methodology, which suggests that if a zip code has ONE provider, that zip code is wired for broadband and we can all sleep well.

Copps knows that you can’t make ANY effective decisions until you have accurate data. The FCC thus far has NOT been concerned with having accurate data because their goal is to portray a functional and competitive broadband environment so they can continue pretending that corporate subsidies and other coddling is an effective policy…..

I’m no great fan of Copps mind you; he whines then votes against consumer best interests anyway, and his tersely worded pdfs are always a day late and a dollar short.

But to suggest he has no first step isn’t accurate. In this age of think tanks promising that our current deregulatory path will result in Utopia, getting a politician to admit we have NO broadband policy is a giant step.

henry evans says:

broadband penetration

The fundamental problem for people who can’t get broadband isn’t really the lack of competition. (Hell, monopoly is better than nothing.) The problem is a lack of entry by anyone. Choices for fixing it are: do nothing (after all there are a lot of great things you can’t get in the sticks); subsidize a private entity to do something (where have we heard this before?); or build publicly owned infrastructure (put it in the next 5 year plan).

My inclination is to view this as a state and local problem. Let states experiment with various approaches. In five years either the problem will go away (because of some nifty new radio technology), or we’ll have a better idea about which kinds of approaches work better. The worst thing to do is just to throw a bunch of money at it (which will do little more than line the pockets of incumbent telephone companies).

chris (profile) says:

separate content and connectivity, it's that simpl

separate content from connectivity and you will have loads of competition.

all the FCC has to do is tell telco and cableco’s that they can deliver content (i.e. applications like VOIP, IPTV, etc.) OR they can provide connectivity to the internet. then the playing field is leveled, there is no need to monopolize anything.

truthnow says:

Bogus posturing

This is just bogus posturing – the telcos are taking the tax breaks and there is no accountability as to penetration gains. All the telcos try to do is to position for max profit and minimum expense – their strategy is purely to get an uncompetitive market they can exploit. They have no vision and their service is lousy – competition makes them work harder and lowers pricing. They will lower prices if they can eliminate competitive access.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »