Bertlesmann's Napster Settlement Could Make Things Difficult For Investors

from the bye-bye-precedent dept

Back in 2003, we were surprised to see Universal Music decide to sue rival Bertelsmann over its investment in Napster. Bertelsmann had been the only major label to buck the RIAA-backed trend of declaring the original Napster as evil, and had actually invested in the company, hoping to make it a platform for legitimate music distribution. While the RIAA took down Napster itself, the lawsuit against Bertelsmann should have made many venture capitalists and other investors pay attention. Essentially, Universal was trying to put liability for what a company did on the shoulders of the investors in that company. If that kind of precedent was set, it would add so much liability to an investment that it would slow down the flow of capital. A year and a half ago, the two companies settled part of the lawsuit, but part of it remained. Yesterday, Universal announced that it was likely buying Bertelsmann’s BMG music division — and, apparently recognizing how awkward it would be to have a lawsuit going on against itself, settled the remaining portion of the lawsuit. Bertelsmann isn’t admitting any liability, but is paying Universal $60 million to end the lawsuit. While it doesn’t set any kind of legal precedent, it could get more people thinking about targeting lawsuits at investors in a company that has legal issues, using the same argument that it was the investors money that “enabled” the wrongdoing. While it’s no surprise that Bertelsmann settled the suit (the executives who made the Napster deal are now long gone), it’s worrisome in what such a settlement represents, and how it may encourage other, similar suits.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Bertlesmann's Napster Settlement Could Make Things Difficult For Investors”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Congrats! says:

Firstly, I’d like to say Congrats to TD for not having some moron say “first” in the first post! Thank you for some moderation! (or is the moron just sleeping?).

To the point,
I think that this is a horrible precedent and if “noticed” by the investment community will have a terrible effect on the $$ available to most startups regardless of their “risk profile”.

(These ARE pretty much the same guys that drive up the price of oil every time there is ANY news from the middle east, good OR bad.)

Anonymous Coward says:


Its a good thing for investors to become liable for the actions of the entities they invest in. Assume this isn’t the highly contentious area of MP3s that is old news, but instead some company polluting like crazy – shouldn’t there be accountability beyond the nominal ceo stooge?

Legal risks are already factoring into costs, so i don’t get why it would reduce the pool of investment available to new enterprise. Also the link to crude oil futures seems dubious.

Agree on the whole lack of first post thing tho.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...