When Leaving Yahoo To Work For A Competitor, Don't Discuss Plans On Yahoo IM

from the just-a-suggestion dept

Yahoo has apparently sued mobile gaming company Mforma, claiming that a bunch of Yahoo employees left together to go to Mforma and took with them trade secrets. These sorts of disputes are fairly common, and usually end in some kind of settlement (in fact, Yahoo just settled a very similar lawsuit that was directed at them). However, what’s interesting here is that the Yahoo employees apparently discussed their plans on company laptops using Yahoo’s instant messaging program. It’s not entirely clear what they discussed, and whether or not it really is directly relevant. However, it still seems like a good idea, that if you are thinking of ditching Yahoo to work somewhere else with a group of your co-workers, you probably shouldn’t discuss those plans using Yahoo’s own communications tools. Just a thought.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “When Leaving Yahoo To Work For A Competitor, Don't Discuss Plans On Yahoo IM”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
13 Comments
gh says:

No Subject Given

Does this mean that Yahoo! records your conversations so they can review them?

How did they find this information out? Do they only go through all their own employees logs? Were the logs from their laptops, or from Yahoo’s servers?

Are the employees told their logs will be read in clear terms? Or is it really the that we should all expect someone is reviewing everything that we say?

I know it feels that way, but if it truly is that way, its a big leap.

I know about Echelon, but this is a private company, and not email which obviously does reside on their servers. IM is supposed to be person to person without intermediaries.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: No Subject Given

From the article — “Drawing heavily from archived instant-messaging conversations …”

It doesn’t give me a warm fuzzy feeling to know that Yahoo archives IM conversations. It would be a worthwhle research article for someone to review the privacy policies of each of the major IM services.

me says:

Re: Re: No Subject Given

Yahoo IM has a built-in archive setting under the Messenger/preferences/Archive menu. When you turn this on, your messages are saved to disk by recipient.

It’s not surprising Yahoo would check this info if the laptops were company-pwned (whoops, little l33t h@x0R slipped in there). NEVER assume anything you do on a company laptop is private, esp. if you and a bunch of your friends are about to jump ship for the same company.

voice of warning says:

Re: No Subject Given

I am amazed at how amny people still believe that anything they communicate on the internet, short of being uber encrypted, is private.

email isn’t private, IM isn’t private, in each, since there is an itermediary, everyone should expect that anything they say can and will be read by someone other than they intended. Not only that, nothing prevents people from publishing those communications, including IM logs. (Not to mention the IM filter applications and boxes that log all IM activity on a corporate network)

You have been warned, now carry on, I have some emails to read – Ted over in accounting is having a fight with his soon to be ex-girlfriend….

Nathan Mallamace (user link) says:

Re: Re: No Subject Given

In regards to your statement “Privacy is long gone” you’re wrong. It was never there to start. In fact if you’re a company like Y!, MSN, AOL, you better CYA because there are a lot of fools out there that are willing to use your service for illegal reasons.

Furthermore, who’s going to watch out for the terrorists?

Kolya says:

There's a distinction to be made . .

. . .between using IM at work on work provided machines and using IM “privately” meaning on your own time and on your own machine.
Anyone working at any decent sized company should assume that all communications of any kind belong to that company and are subject to interception/retrieval. Those folks who were leaving were naive or dumb not to assume this.

Bigfatdummy says:

No Subject Given

Most company handbooks/policies now state that all communication is the property of the company and not the individual users. We (at my company) recently had to let an accountant go. The accountant emailed sensitive material (bank account information, tax id, etc) to his/her personal email account. Lucky for us our IT guy caught it and reported it to us. Logs can be a wonderful thing.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »