SEC Looking Into The Clickfraud Issue?

from the for-what-purpose? dept

Click fraud in pay-per-click offerings is nothing new. In fact, at this point, all of the articles on click fraud are getting quite tiresome. They all say the same thing, and none seem to suggest much of a solution to the problem. However, someone who prefers to remain anonymous submitted a story saying that all that press attention on click fraud has made the SEC interested in looking into the issue to see if Google and others are inflating their revenue and stock price by fraud. There’s no formal investigation, but it’s being described as “on the commissions’ radar screen.” That’s interesting, but it seems like it would be extraordinarily difficult for the SEC to go after companies like Google or Yahoo — who do try to stop clickfraud. It’s not something that you can just snap your fingers and stop. This is really no different than individual lawsuits that have been filed against Google claiming they could stop click fraud if they wanted to. If someone could explain how, it might help. It would be very surprising if the SEC really went after anyone for this issue.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “SEC Looking Into The Clickfraud Issue?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
1 Comment
Flat soda says:

No Subject Given

Maybe the point isn’t going to be about the ability to stop click fraud if they wanted to. Or how that prevention might be acheived. But rather should the SEC look into the setting up of a business practice that by it’s very design is open to fraudulent activity. In other words, the pay-per-click revenue scheme is just not a viable option if they can’t protect it from fraud. No matter how hard they try, they can’t ensure against fraud to a reasonable extent. A very very loose analogy would be the prohibition of Ponzi schemes.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...