Kicking A Spammer In The Nuts Daily Turns Out To Be Effective

from the at-least-so-far dept

While some people are big fans of the idea of vigilante justice against spammers, it seems only likely to lead to problems eventually. However, with companies such as IBM buying into the idea of vigilante justice on spammers, it’s no surprise that the idea has built up quite a strong following. The latest effort, launched just last month, was named Kick a Spammer in the Nuts Daily (descriptive, yes?) and consists of having a ton of people fill out bogus orders on spammed sites. Brian McWilliams is now saying this method has worked against one spammer who is now begging for mercy. However, as McWilliams notes, it’s unlikely most spammers will give in. Many will figure out ways around these attacks — and they may start attacking back. And, of course, these sorts of vigilante actions way too often end up with totally innocent parties being harmed as well. While it’s enjoyable to see a spammer begging for mercy, the risks of this method mean it’s likely to backfire at some point.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Kicking A Spammer In The Nuts Daily Turns Out To Be Effective”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
ConceptJunkie says:

Re: Re: Site now illegal?

I’m not a lawyer, but as I understand it the law makes it illegal to annoy people annonymously

I’m not either, I’m human. However, from what I understand the new law says it’s illegal to annoy people anonymously in ways that are _not protected by the First Amendment_. It is intended to make sure telephone harassment laws apply to VOIP.

In other words, no one is arguing that harassing phone calls is protected speech… and VOIP, as essentially another form of telephone, needs to be treated the same way.

Of course, that doesn’t mean its not worded overly broadly or subject to abuse or just another reason for the Feds to spy on citizens or I’m just plain wrong, but that explanation makes sense to me.

(How’s that for politician-like qualification of a statement?)

Happy Golucky says:

Re: Re: Re: Site now illegal?

I worked for a spammer, they were a legit company but they sent spam just the same. They’re pretty easy to kill really, you just have to coordinate and cooperate.

You want to make life hell for them and maybe put them out of business, fill in the forms with valid and totally useless information. Each form you fill out turns into a qualified lead for the advertisers. The advertiser pays for the bogus leads, and gets pissed when they find out they’re bogus. Then the advertiser gets a partial refund of that month’s lead bill, reducing the already paper thin margin of online advertising companies to a negative number.

Fill them in and eventually you’ll bankrupt the ad company. To go even further, report the IP of each spam email you get to That 1 site caused more trouble for us (when I worked for the devil) that you can imagine, since oodles of large companies use them as a source of SMTP blacklist data.

Why not? says:

Re: Re: Re: Site now illegal?

Well, come on, people. Spammers knowingly break the laws because they know that that same laws exist to protect them. They know that when the government is busy debating witetaps on their own citizens and trying to dupe the public that the Bush’ war in Iraq is not his personal vandetta for his daddy, no one will bother spammers for a long long time. The whole idea of the capitalistic idelogy is that laws will be circumvented and citizens rights infringed as long as there is money to be made. Meanwhile we, the innocent citizens, have to deal with spam in our inboxes, and no one cares to help us. The government inaction is a wrong thing as well as vigilantizm is. Two wrongs don’t make it right; perhaps, 3 wrongs will. When it comes to spam, stop fire with fire. It’s the only logical solution until Bush is in the office.

Josh says:

Automated SPAM fighting

Don’t just block spam, stop it altogether. Blue Frog from – Fully automated. Just sign up, and forward your SPAM to them. They analyze it, send a complaint for each peice of spam to the spammer, the company that’s being advertised, and any legal authority like the FCC, SEC (stock spam), FDA (prescription drugs), etc. It works.

SpamSlayer (user link) says:

Re: Automated SPAM fighting

I’m SpamSlayer. I started the ‘Kick A Spammer In The Nuts Daily’ campaign at

It should be noted that the spammer mentioned in the article above is Alex Polyakov, out of the Ukraine… he’s earned himself a ROKSO designation, and is ranked as the second largest spammer in the world.

When we band together, we can take down even the largest of spammers and make them plead for mercy. So I want you all to kick a spammer in the nuts… daily.

Yeknom says:

But what's the point?

Most of these things have failed in the past or have been shut down. Lycos’s Make Love Not Spam was shut down. Form Fucker apparently went underground. Blue Security’s Blue Frog seems to have cleaned up and found a legal way to do it.
But really, what annoys me with vigilante justice is that there’s no point, except getting a laugh out of spammers suffering (don’t get me wrong, it IS satistfying!). Blue seem to have thought one step ahead, because the “global opt out list” the poor spammer that was “kicked in the nuts” here suggested is actually what Blue has been trying to do all along. Send spam to their users, don’t expect any mercy. Clean their users, and you won’t be touched.

SpamSlayer (user link) says:

Re: But what's the point?

Well, with Polyakov, it’s not just about the spamming… he’s one of the world’s largest criminals, as well.

He’s got a large money laundering operation in the US, where he ‘hires’ unsuspecting people, sends them money, which they put in their personal bank accounts, then draw out later and forward to the Ukraine.

He’s got a large credit card theft ring in the US, and deals in tens of thousands of stolen credit cards and credit card numbers each year.

He’s done several investment scams (Dornstetten Deutsche,, Ryan Kelly Jungle Ventures,, etc.), and stolen a lot of people’s e-gold accounts.

He’s somehow connected to the Pavka/Artofit kiddie porn ring.

He’s done several phishes, most of them under the name ‘Foundation Men On Line’.

He is, of course, a spammer. In addition to spamming, he’s running a large botnet to host some of his spamvertised sites. He tried switching his sites over to the botnet early last month in response to the high bandwidth bills he was experiencing from the SpamVampire data-draining we were putting him through… which is when we implemented the Refi Retaliator II.

He’s historically accounted for ~12% to 27% of spam reported to various spam-reporting agencies. Today, he accounted for ~40% of spam reported to SpamCop…

Taking this scumbag down will do the entire world a lot of good.

Frank Zappa (user link) says:

Re: Re: But what's the point?

Taking this scumbag down will do the entire world a lot of good.

No it won’t. Spammers don’t exist because there evil people cabbalistically plotting to annoy you. Spammers exist because it’s a profitable endeavor, supply and demand.
Take down this guy, and someone will replace him. Of course I could be wrong, maybe we’re “winning” the “War on (Some) Drugs” too.

why not? says:

Re: Re: Re: But what's the point?

supply and demand? Unfortunately, you’re right. A lot of legit business are willing to go in bed with spammers, plenty of providers cover for them. Alan Ralsky claimed in his interview that he had to put people on waiting list for his spam-blasts. Sad situation. What pisses me off the most that even legitimate marketeers are too cheap to implement double opt-in systems, and they sell their questinably obtained lists to whoever is willing to pay a buck or two. 2 months ago I set up address for my 10-year old kid. He only sighed up for two kids gaming sites. I recently checked his inbox and found 6 spams there: one was trying to sell him a car, another – credit cards, and another guru tried to sell him his get-rich-quick book. I wouldn’t be surprised that some time down the road my 10 year old will start receiving viagra spams from Medic Suite and cumshots spams from Australia.

T. Oswell-Coyle says:

Re: Re: Re:2 But what's the point?

You guys talk about spam like it’s society’s greatest evil.
OK, phishing is scary and nasty (also deservedly criminal) but sending out dumb-ass ads for Cialis or whatever? What do I care?
It’s a free country, right?
I get loads of that stuff. It goes straight into my bulk folder and I delete once every few days without looking at it.
Please explain why you’re so up in arms about spam?

Wingfat says:

has to be done

I am all for spamming the spamers. I write automation scripts for companies all the time. just last week my friend had got an email from a Phisher trying to get his eBay account info. He wanted to me to make a program that would go to that page and type in bogus info adn submit it over and over. so i did. and now the link to the page doesnt work any more. so yes spamming or over loading the Phishers web sites with bogus info works. 🙂

Rick (user link) says:

Why blue security works

The way Blue Security works is by filling out forms with invalid data – in the comments they politely 😉 ask the spammer to exlude their mails from their list. They include a link to a program which will wipe out listed addresses (they use hashing so the actual e-mails can’t be extracted).

This is nota DDoS attack, since the “attacks” are not done at the same time, plus only one e-mail is sent per mail received.

Recently a spammer tool includes the option to remove the blue security e-mails from their mailing lists, so this approach has been proven to work.

(BTW, my e-mail is not my real e-mail, it’s a honeypot, send all your spam there! muahahahaha 😉 )

Nicholas Bieber says:

bluefrog not so good

I installed and use blue frog for a few months, and now it’s coming back to bite me pretty severly, 20 times spam I was getting, plus a few messages like below. I was excited for a bit about living without spam… damn.



You are recieving this email because you are a member of BlueSecurity (

You signed up because you were expecting to recieve a lesser amount of spam, unfortunately, due to the tactics used by BlueSecurity, you will end up recieving this message, or other nonsensical spams 20-40 times more than you would normally.

How do you make it stop?

Simple, in 48 hours, and every 48 hours thereafter, we will run our current list of BlueSecurity subscribers through BlueSecurity’s database, if you arent there.. you wont get this again.

We have devised a method to retrieve your address from their database, so by signing up and remaining a BlueSecurity user not only are you opening yourself up for this, you are also potentially verifying your email address through them to even more spammers, and will end up getting up even more spam as an end-result.

By signing up for bluesecurity, you are doing the exact opposite of what you want, so delete your account, and you will stop recieving this.

Why are we doing this?

Its simple, we dont want to, but BlueSecurity is forcing us. We would much rather not waste our resources and send you these useless mails, but do not believe for one second that we will stop this tirade of emails if you choose to stay with BlueSecurity.

Just remember one thing when you read this, we didnt do this to you, BlueSecurity did.

If BlueSecurity decides to play fair, we will do the same.

We are quite sure you will think this will not continue, that we will not continue wasting our resources doing this, feel free to wait out the first 48, or the second, and see whether these stop, you will be quite suprised.

If you have another email under the protection of bluesecurity, and have not recieved this there, do not worry, you will soon enough.

We mightve had your email addresses before in our lists, but now, we are targetting YOU, because YOU are a bluesecurity user.

You might also notice, that the BlueSecurity site( is down..

Just remove yourself from BlueSecurity, and make it easier on you.

Cybercommuter says:

Blue Frog

I started using BlueSecurity’s Blue Frog in Januay and gave up using it it the latter part of April because it did not seem to be having any effect, it was an additional chore besides deleting the junk, and it also meant that the bandwidth stolen by the junkmail senders became double since all received junkmail was also resent to Blue. About a week after quitting Blue, on May 2, the junk sudenly increased exponentially. One junkmail, I noticed, was the “Hey, you are receiving this because…” thing. That made me realize that Blue really WAS having the intended effect. Most of the increased junk was not even trying to sell anything, just simply designed to harrass. That means the vermin Alex Polyakov really IS feeling the heat. So needless to say, I reinstalled Blue Frog. But alas, it does not function, and the bluesecurity website is unaccessable.

Help! I want my frog back!

Netizen says:

blue frog seems to work!

same here…installed it some months back, then got lazy and doubtful if the concept worked, changed computers, didnt care to reinstall. But now this one spammer has declared war on us/normal users, threatening us, mailbombing us, rather than just cleaning his list and leaving us alone.

Smart move.

Guess what I did first thing I had some internet time: install blue frog ap, install blue frog firefox extension, install blue frog thunderbird extension. And I will make sure to let lots and lots of people know about this wonderful little friend and hold their hands while they install.

Good thing there are still thousands of unreported spam messages in my spam folder – looking forward very much to getting more spam and reporting all of it, and then having the frog work overtime.

This is the first time in 10 years of emailing something really seems to work well against spammers – it will be some very interesting months ahead with the blue frog community growing to millions and hopefully the spammer’s profits diminuishing to pennies.

So go ahead, install that frog, enjoy the feeling of DOING something against spam rather than just filtering and deleting. Don’t worry about this “vigilante” and “DoS”-talk (mostly coming from the spammers themselves, but even in most media articles) – total nonsense. For every spam you get, your frog fills in one unsubscribe request. AFTER a 10-day warning. If that isnt dealing fair with spammers, what is?

Go little frog, you might be the magic solution. And if spammers find some way to block you…well at least it was worth a try and a very entertaining one at that. I got some great laughs out of those spammer threats. 🙂

Cybercommuter says:

blue frog seems to work!

Hi there Netizen

> This is the first time in 10 years of emailing something really seems to work well against spammers – it will be some very interesting months ahead with the blue frog community growing to millions and hopefully the spammer’s profits diminuishing to pennies.

I believe that is why that one junkmail spammer decided to attack us rather than comply with the Do Not Intrude Registry, he could see the writing on the wall. By complying, he would only have to delete 450,000 people from his junkmail list, out of the tens of millions or hundreds of millions he must have on the list. And he knows that people who have gone through the effort of joining Blue Frog would never in a million years buy anything from a spammer, so it would cost him not a single penny to comply. But instead he chose to retaliate against our retaliation. This is definitely costing him in terms of time and effort. So why, when it would be so much easier to comply? Because when word starts getting out that Blue Frog works, EVERYBODY will join in. And he will have to quit the junkmail business and start working working for a living like the rest of us.

> Don’t worry about this “vigilante” and “DoS”-talk (mostly coming from the spammers themselves, but

Right. We’ve got them on the run.

Odd thing, but yesterday (May 6 in my time zone) the barrage stopped as abruptly as it started. In fact, the volume of junk seems to be less than in was before the attack started, except for the repeated threats to quit Blue Frog or else. Has he decided that the best way to deal with it is to just shut up and don’t raise a storm? Or is he planning something more sinister? If the latter, I am prepared to stay the course. We now have proof that the Frog really works. The only thing that can stop us from defeating junkmail now is if we back down.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...