No Free Speech In Advertising When It Comes To The Olympics

from the you-must-pay-up-first dept

Ah, the Olympics. While many people think of great sporting events, increasingly, it seems that the Olympics is becoming associated with heavy handed attempts to stop anyone from mentioning the Olympics without paying up first. A few years ago, the US Olympics committee went cease-and-desist happy by threatening anyone who used the word “Olympics” even if it was clear that the event was separate from the real Olympics. Then, at last year’s Athens Olympics, various radio stations were forced to turn off their regular internet streams because they had only paid for the radio rights, and not coughed up even more money for the internet radio rights. Then, athletes were told that they were not allowed to write about the Olympics on their own websites, as that might take away from the media companies that had paid to cover the Olympics. So, the latest news, submitted by John, is that over in the UK, a bill is being proposed that would make it illegal for an advertiser to mention the Olympics or use imagery related to the Olympics unless they were an official sponsor. This isn’t about trademark violations, which would be covered by existing law — but about specifically banning any reference to the games. Non-sponsoring advertisers could not use any combination of the following words: “games”, “medals”, “gold”, “2012”, “sponsor” or “summer” in any ads. The Olympics claims they need to do this to “protect” their sponsors — but it’s unclear why they deserve any kind of special protection. It’s just yet another case of people misusing intellectual property for their own short-term benefit. In this case, all it will serve to do is make the Olympics that much less interesting.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “No Free Speech In Advertising When It Comes To The Olympics”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Mousky (user link) says:


Blame it on the Los Angeles Olympics. They were privately financed and made a supposed “profit” of over $200 million US. Ever since then, the Olympics have become a commercial juggernaut. The fact that the atheletes could not write about their experience through a blog reflects the commercial nature of the Olympics. It’s all about the money not the glory.

Brad says:

0Iymp1c Hopefuls?

A local Minneapolis band, The Olympic Hopefuls, was forced to drop the first half of their name. Apparently the USOC has some semblence of a sense of humor: “One representative reportedly pointed out that the Hopefuls’ colorful stage outfits are Puma tracksuits and not Adidas, the official supplier for U.S. Olympic athletes.” Full article here.

Anonymous of Course says:

Re: 0Iymp1c Hopefuls?

They just forced the Ferret Olympics to drop the term olympic from their title. I can see why as they’re easily confused- ferrets and weasels. Will Olympic Pizza be next? The olympic games are so far removed from their roots that I have no interest in them or their sponsors. A pox on them all.

Mast Maker says:

No Subject Given

What a come down from the Pierre’s ideals. Did it take only 109 years (more like 80+ years since it started in 70s) for it to rot this bad?

What next? A multi-billion dollar Boy Scouts Corporation? How about a for-profit(-ONLY!) United Nation Inc and its wholly owned subsidiary UNESCO Ltd?

May be a Religion Inc which buys out Catholicism,Islam,Hinduism and Buddhism is not a bad idea.

I am also for a Global Government Inc. headed by Dubya which will go on a buying spree, buying up all other governments. May work out to be cheaper than waging wars.

The Dude says:

You Better know where you towel is.

Well what do you expect! England is the land where if you get an idea you get hit in the head with a shovel. (Note: this is a joke in regards to Douglas Adams novel. I am not really itending this to be serious.)

Or at least in the judicial since. These are the same guys who say if you want your CD in a MP3 format you have to buy both formats don’t use your computer to rip the CD into a MP3.

Whats next? Animals sueing people??????

You hit a Cat with your car and next thing you know you are having to pay some society of cats money because of wrongfulld death???

Where is my electronic thumb, it’s time to get off this rock.

Again: Brithish people = Great, Judicial systems of the world = brain dead zombies who haven’t changed mentally since grade school.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...