Does The RIAA's Silver Bullet Break Wiretap Laws?

from the looks-likely dept

The RIAA has been running around the halls of Congress showing off Audible Magic as the “silver bullet” against file sharers. Audible Magic is a system that claims to be able to identify and stop file sharing of unauthorized files in its tracks. While some have accused the product of being vaporware, it certainly is getting plenty of attention. The EFF has taken a quick look and pointed out that for all the hype, there are some simple workarounds that would make Audible Magic ineffective very quickly. However, Ernest Miller raises an even more important question: does Audible Magic violate wiretap laws? After all, it’s intercepting communications without the users’ knowledge. He goes through the various exceptions and points out that Audible Magic doesn’t seem to apply at all. Thus, it likely is an illegal wiretap. The one way to make it “legal” is if consent is somehow given beforehand. Then, of course, the problems get worse, because you’ve basically had someone agree to have all of their internet traffic open for snooping. Seems like an awful lot of effort for technology that doesn’t even work.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Does The RIAA's Silver Bullet Break Wiretap Laws?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Saygin(?) says:

Email Wiretap applies to Audible Magic

I’m surprised you didn’t reference the recent court decision on email and wiretap. With this precedent – and no clear proof that there is a truly serverless P2P network – the question of whether Audible Magic’s software violates wiretap cannot even be considered until the Congress or Supreme Court responds to the lower court’s ruling that Email is not subject to wiretap law.

Mike (profile) says:

Re: Email Wiretap applies to Audible Magic

The article makes it clear that this actually does not apply:

For those who are wondering, the recent email wiretap case, US v. Councilman, which I’ve discussed previously (E-Mail Wiretap Decision: Out of the Wiretap Frying Pan, Into the Copyright Fire), would not control in this case. Unlike the copying of stored emails, Audible Magic involves packet sniffing, which would be a “contemporaneous acquisition” and thus the equivalent of a wiretap.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...