Should The FCC Be Disbanded?

from the who-needs-it? dept

Some have argued in the past that new technology will make spectrum interference a thing of the past – meaning that spectrum allocation policies won’t matter any more. If that’s the case, then who needs the FCC? Of course, there are still plenty of spectrum interference issues these days, and an awful lot of legacy issues that would cause problems if spectrum policy was just thrown wide open. Declan McCullough has a somewhat different take on the issue, but comes to the same conclusion that there’s no need for the FCC. Instead of just abolishing spectrum allocation, though, he believes it should be entirely privatized, with companies who can buy, own and sell spectrum – and any disputes can be settled in the courts. That sounds great until you remember the years wasted in court fighting over the disputed NextWave spectrum and whether or not it was owned by NextWave, the FCC, or the other carriers the FCC had “resold” it to. What’s clear is that we do need a massively overhauled spectrum allocation policy that wasn’t created on an “as necessary” basis – but takes into account a much more comprehensive view of what needs to be done with spectrum allocation. The biggest problem with all of this, though, is how to deal with legacy issues – and simply throwing it all open to the courts, will pretty much guarantee that nothing gets done (other than a ridiculous number of lawsuits) for many years.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Should The FCC Be Disbanded?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

The FCC's Other Role

Technical roles like allocating spectrum aren’t the FCC’s only function. They also regulate content: a political function mostly accomplished indirectly by regulating who gets to broadcast on the “public” airwaves. Especially news broadcasts. Chairman Powell has remarked in interviews that the biggest danger to America he sees from the internet is that it allows people to get “unfiltered” news.
Of course, federal courts could perform the same function since it is political and not technical in nature.

alternatives says:

Ok, I'm game

he believes it should be entirely privatized, with companies who can buy, own and sell spectrum – and any disputes can be settled in the courts.

What a wonderful thought!

Now, who do I sue?

1) Ham Radio operators – with the ham space gone, who do they sue?
2) The EM waves passing through my body cause damage – who do I sue for that damage?
3) If they put the RF wave out there and I decode it, did I ‘take’ their ‘content’?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...