CEOs Done With Cost Cutting

from the now-focused-on-cost-raising?? dept

A new study from IBM is being used to suggest that the economy is coming back. They asked a bunch of CEOs what they’re focusing on now and discovered that after years of focusing on “cost cutting”, CEOs are done with that. Now they’re focusing on revenue generation. While the article talks about what this might mean for the economy, I find it more interesting to think about what it says about CEOs (or whoever put through this study). It seems to reinforce the silly single-minded approach to running a business, where you can only focus on one side of the cost-benefit equation at a time. In the boom years, companies only focused on revenue generation, ignoring the cost side. Since the bubble burst, it’s all about controlling the cost side, without any concept of how cutting costs harms revenue generation. Now, the pendulum is apparently swinging back. At what point do CEOs realize there’s more than one side to look at, and start viewing both sides together and making more informed and balanced decisions?


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “CEOs Done With Cost Cutting”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
2 Comments
DV Henkel-Wallace says:

Not necessarily brain-damaged!

I find it more interesting to think about what it says about CEOs (or whoever put through this study). It seems to reinforce the silly single-minded approach to running a business, where you can only focus on one side of the cost-benefit equation at a time.

Actually, it’s not necessarily as stupid as you think.
First of all, your company could be in trouble, so you don’t have time to grow the business before it runs out of cash. So you have to get your burn rate below the income rate and hope that you keep the business running in the mean time.
Secondly, and this is the worse one, the markets may have “fashion” and may penalize you for certain kinds of investment. So yes, although you’re always pedalling and steering at the same time, you may need to emphasize one or the other in order to 1> get all employees on the same page and 2> get the market to understand what you’re doing.
And while we may say that the best businesses should just ignore the markets and run themselves the “best” way possible, if you need more capital with which to grow you can’t ignore market fashions.
There are other reasons too, but these are the big top 2.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...