Group Questions Pennsylvania Site-Blocking Law

from the it's-about-time dept

Earlier this month Pennsylvania’s Attorney General announced that they won’t release their their list of banned sites because, after all, the point of them being banned is that someone in Pennsylvania’s government who knows better than you doesn’t think you should see the website. Today, the Center for Democracy and Technology appealed that decision as they’re concerned about innocent sites (such as those co-hosted at the same IP address) being caught in the crossfire. Of course, this appeal is unlikely to change their mind, as they seem to believe that only people in the Attorney General’s office have special powers that make it okay for them to see the websites in question and make sure they’re “bad” for the rest of us. If, as expected, this happens, then the CDT could sue in state court, but they say they’re going to wait and see for now.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Group Questions Pennsylvania Site-Blocking Law”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
jeff says:


Maybe you should point out that this is CHILD PORN that is getting blocked. I am glad they are doing this to keep kids safe. I love how people try to skew this as blocking adult pron but it is Kiddie PORN people!!!!!! It isn’t protected by free speach. and I read the law. The ISP’s are told the URL of the site not the ip address. according to many ISP’s are blocking by URL ans some block by IP cause it’s easier not because they have to.

Mike (profile) says:

Re: uhhhh

The issue isn’t necessarily what kind of porn it is, but that the sites are being blocked with no review.

First off, if they’re kiddie porn, then they should be reported to whoever is hosting the material. Then, the site should be taken offline and those responsible arrested. Telling an ISP they should block it, instead of actually taking it offline is bad.

Second, there should be some sort of review process. By keeping it closed, no one knows if Pennsylvania is really taking down kiddie porn, or if they’re blocking sites that express viewpoints they disagree with.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...