Should File Sharing Companies Rely On The Betamax Doctrine?

from the risky-moves dept

A very interesting discussion about whether or not file sharing companies are making a mistake by relying on the “betamax doctrine” in defending their services. The betamax doctrine comes from the Supreme Court case from 1984 saying that VCRs (and Betamaxes) were legal because they had non-infinging uses. However, there are plenty of debates as to whether or not such a ruling should also apply to file sharing software applications. So far, all the companies that have used that defense have lost, and some fear that if the next group (Morpheus, Kazaa and Grokster) also lose on that issue, then it will effectively kill the use of the “non-infringing uses” test to see whether or not a technology is legal.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Should File Sharing Companies Rely On The Betamax Doctrine?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
1 Comment

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...