Can We Build An IM Bot That Discusses Bad Patents?

from the more-for-the-lawyers dept

In yet another example of bad patents, ActiveBuddy has been granted a patent for creating instant mesasging bots. The scary thing, however, is just how smug ActiveBuddy’s founder, Tim Kay, sounds in the quotes in the article where he talks about going after anyone else who is creating IMbots. For example: “We invented interactive agents. Anybody using his or her own tools is obviously using our technology without paying us.” There are plenty of examples of prior art, which Kay simply brushes off by saying, “I am fairly confident, there were no interactive agents on IM at that point when the application was filed. I’m certainly not aware of any.” In other words, just because he didn’t know of any, they obviously could not have existed.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Can We Build An IM Bot That Discusses Bad Patents?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Randy Cartwright says:

What an ass.

I mean that guy may be a good person ( giving him the benefit of the doubt ) but, he comes across as one of the worst kind of weaselly, corporate, we’re-going-to-sue-you types around. He should just come out and say, “We don’t care what all these unfunded losers think because, we have a patent and money for lawyers.”

todd says:

i thought so...

Here’s a link to someone who created an AI bot that passed the Turing test (he claims) in 1989 using a crude Vax VMS version of “chat”

Actually, he has a good set of links on old AI and chat ‘bots’.

Good luck with enforcing that patent, cocky mofo.

And another big “thanks” to our patent office!

SC (user link) says:


Do I really need to point out all of the IRC bot scripts/programs that have existed over the years? I created bots prior to the filing of that patent. One would even monitor conversations in a small channel and try to learn appropriate responses. (It didn’t work that well)

How could anyone possibly think this was a unique and new patentable idea. While IRC isn’t exactly the same as IM it’s not that terribly far off, and this is just an extension of pre-existing work.

I think they need to create a new computer division of the patent office that isn’t so moronic.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...