Too Many Tech Magazines

from the overwhelmed dept

A rambling discussion in Salon about all these tech magazines and how they have no way to keep their content as fresh and strong as it needs to be to be a “must read”. Personally, I’ve stopped all subscriptions to print magazines (and I used to get a lot). I do still get Business 2.0, but I’m pretty sure my subscription ran out long ago, so I’m not sure why it still comes. I must admit, I used to read it too, but now that they’ve switched to publishing bi-weekly, I’ve noticed they just pile up. I can’t keep up. I read enough news (if you hadn’t noticed) on the web. The article does point out that the time it takes from being a “must read” to a “has been” is now about 15 months. Maybe I should start considering “Techdirt – the Magazine”.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Too Many Tech Magazines”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
mhh5 says:

maybe on digital ink...

Mike, I know you were just joking. But I’ll just throw out my 2 cents, and say Techdirt the Magazine is a horrible idea. In fact, I’d say most mass-printed material based on time-critical information is a horrible idea. As soon as it’s printed, it’s worthless. Unless there are some ardent techdirt-readers out there who like to archive old news…

Michael Armstrong (user link) says:

As if...

I can’t say that I’m terribly surprised. I get a couple of the ZDNet and Infoworld “newsletters” via email and they’re constantly three or four days behind. Quite often a story I’ll see here or on Slashdot will show up a day or two later through them with a “breaking news/this just in” attitude.

I figure if they can’t even get that right, the print versions don’t stand a chance. It doesn’t help that lead times are MUCH longer for the print world. It’s like starting a race after the fastest guy has already crossed the finish line.

Mike (profile) says:

Re: Re: As if...

Um, well, we’re *way* too ugly for TV. 🙂 We’d have to hire actors to play all of us. As for radio… we did have the one episode which kinda sucked. We then had the second episode which was great, but which we deleted in a moment of pure stupidity. Look for it to return sometime soon when we get our act together.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...