Just Because You Make Money, It Doesn't Mean You Lose Section 230 Safe Harbors

from the well,-that's-good dept

When talking about the importance of Section 230 safe harbors, one thing I've seen multiple people declare is that if a site earns money directly from content on a site, such safe harbors no longer apply. However, a recent court ruling points out this is simply not true. The case involved New Jersey's attorney general suing an online ticket reseller because some of the site's users had offered concert tickets for a Bruce Springsteen show before they were even available. But rather than going after the folks who actually posted/sold the tickets, the focus was on the site, TicketNetwork, which is operated by CheapTickes and branded by Orbitz. One of the arguments used against the site, was that since it made money on every transaction, safe harbors like Section 230 do not apply. Thankfully, the court rejected that:
The fact that the defendants charge "service" or "administrative" fees is irrelevant to the CDA analysis. Plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from "advertising and selling concert tickets to consumers without actually having those tickets in their possession or control." This conduct, however, conduct [sic] fits squarely within the CDA's purview.
Nice to see a court get things like this right. As Eric Goldman notes above, it's especially surprising, because courts rarely side against the government in so-called "consumer protection"-type lawsuits, such as this one.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    JustMe (profile), Sep 14th, 2010 @ 6:32am

    Awesome to see a win for the good guys

    Great news.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 14th, 2010 @ 8:10am

    Limewire, even though it did benefit from ad revenue to some extent, would not be in the trouble it is in had it not participated in helping some people learn how to download specific infringing content.

    The moral, I guess, is that 230 is a potent defense...as long as a site stays within its limits and even if the site makes $$$.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    hirklins, Sep 21st, 2010 @ 11:46pm

    Traffic Siphone on law harbour

    If you heard about traffic siphon, mark and george are top IM just release a new revolution technique. This is a great technique. I wait for almost 2 weeks for mark & george publish it.. anyway just to share some blogs that describe in more honest way.. www.epodmalaysia.com/fbmonetize they give details screenshot in the VIP area. Good luck with your online business. P/S i personally advice to test the video no1. on traffic siphon. I manage to make money after 5 days of using it. Have fun and be responsible towards all the tips ya... highly dangerous for non serious marketers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This